ARTICLE
28 September 2016

Halbhuber Authors Opinion Piece On Congressional Intent In Debt Restructurings

AO
A&O Shearman

Contributor

A&O Shearman was formed in 2024 via the merger of two historic firms, Allen & Overy and Shearman & Sterling. With nearly 4,000 lawyers globally, we are equally fluent in English law, U.S. law and the laws of the world’s most dynamic markets. This combination creates a new kind of law firm, one built to achieve unparalleled outcomes for our clients on their most complex, multijurisdictional matters – everywhere in the world. A firm that advises at the forefront of the forces changing the current of global business and that is unrivalled in its global strength. Our clients benefit from the collective experience of teams who work with many of the world’s most influential companies and institutions, and have a history of precedent-setting innovations. Together our lawyers advise more than a third of NYSE-listed businesses, a fifth of the NASDAQ and a notable proportion of the London Stock Exchange, the Euronext, Euronext Paris and the Tokyo and Hong Kong Stock Exchanges.
Counsel Harald Halbhuber (New York-Capital Markets) wrote an opinion piece, titled "Congress Never Intended Windfall for Bond Holdouts," that was published by Forbes on September 23.
United States Insolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring

Counsel  Harald Halbhuber (New York-Capital Markets) wrote an opinion piece, titled "Congress Never Intended Windfall for Bond Holdouts," that was published by Forbes on September 23.

In his commentary, Halbhuber looks at recent court cases that have severely constrained what distressed companies and their creditors can do in debt restructurings to prevent holdout bondholders from benefitting from the sacrifices made by other creditors in staving off bankruptcy. These cases are based on the Trust Indenture Act, which has recently been interpreted not only to prohibit impairing a bondholder's legal right to payment, but also transactions that affect their actual recovery on the bond. Halbhuber contends that such a construction is contrary to Congress' intent in enacting the law back in 1939. "Holdout bondholders that believe they are being treated unfairly should make their case just like other creditors, on the basis of the contract or on equitable grounds," Halbhuber says. "There is no evidence that Congress intended windfall recovery for them."

Read the full opinion piece, Congress Never Intended Windfall for Bond Holdouts.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More