Article
CoA, June 29, 2026, Appeal Decision On Public Access To File Under R. 262.1(b) RoP, UPC_CoA_52/2026 And UPC_CoA_53/2026
In two parallel infringement proceedings that had been terminated before a decision on the merits was rendered, a law firm applied for access to the parties’ written submissions under R. 262.1(b) RoP, citing educational and advisory purposes. The judge-rapporteur of the Munich LD granted access subject to redactions of confidential information.
Germany IP
BP
Bardehle Pagenberg
Article
LD Brussels, June 26, 2026, Alignment Of UPC Evidence Production With Parallel UK National Proceedings Under R. 190 RoP, UPC_CFI_629/2026, UPC_CFI_1357/2025
In an infringement action with a parallel counterclaim for revocation, the court had issued a first R. 190 RoP order (Order I), ordering the claimant to produce seven categories of evidence, which it did. The defendants then filed a second R. 190 RoP application (Application II), arguing that the evidence produced revealed further relevant material in the claimant’s control.
Germany IP
BP
Bardehle Pagenberg
See more

Mondaq's Must Reads

Article
One Rulebook For 27 Markets: EU Inc And The Future Of European Company Law (Podcast)
Against a backdrop of sustained political pressure to address Europe’s innovation and competitiveness gap, the European Commission has published its long-anticipated legislative proposal for an EU-wide corporate legal form, commonly referred to as “EU Inc”. The proposal forms the centrepiece of a new “28th regime” corporate legal framework, introducing a harmonised EU-wide company form aimed primarily at supporting startups and scaleups, while being open to all founders and companies across the Union.
Ireland Commercial
M
Matheson

Trending This Week on Mondaq

Tax

Subscribe

Related Guides

See more
Article
CoA, June 29, 2026, Appeal Decision On Public Access To File Under R. 262.1(b) RoP, UPC_CoA_52/2026 And UPC_CoA_53/2026
In two parallel infringement proceedings that had been terminated before a decision on the merits was rendered, a law firm applied for access to the parties’ written submissions under R. 262.1(b) RoP, citing educational and advisory purposes. The judge-rapporteur of the Munich LD granted access subject to redactions of confidential information.
Germany IP
BP
Bardehle Pagenberg
Article
LD Brussels, June 26, 2026, Alignment Of UPC Evidence Production With Parallel UK National Proceedings Under R. 190 RoP, UPC_CFI_629/2026, UPC_CFI_1357/2025
In an infringement action with a parallel counterclaim for revocation, the court had issued a first R. 190 RoP order (Order I), ordering the claimant to produce seven categories of evidence, which it did. The defendants then filed a second R. 190 RoP application (Application II), arguing that the evidence produced revealed further relevant material in the claimant’s control.
Germany IP
BP
Bardehle Pagenberg
See more