ARTICLE
23 June 2025

United States v. Miller: U.S. Supreme Court Narrows The Scope Of Sovereign Immunity Abrogation Under Section 106(a)

GG
Greenberg Glusker Fields Claman & Machtinger

Contributor

Greenberg Glusker is a full-service law firm in Los Angeles, California with clients that span the globe. For 65 years, the firm has delivered first-tier legal services, rooted in understanding clients' intricate business needs and personal concerns. With tailored solutions driving outstanding results, we go beyond the practice of law; we become committed partners in our clients' success.
The United States Supreme Court has held that the sovereign immunity waiver in Section 106(a) of the Bankruptcy Code does not extend to state law claims...
United States Insolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring

The United States Supreme Court has held that the sovereign immunity waiver in Section 106(a) of the Bankruptcy Code does not extend to state law claims "nested" within a Section 544(b) claim for relief, depriving bankruptcy trustees of the right to sue the United States under state law to avoid prepetition fraudulent transfers of debtor funds. United States v. Miller, 604 U.S. ___, 145 S.Ct. 839 (2025).

Partner Uzzi Raanan, a past Business Law Section (BLS) representative to the California Lawyers Association's (CLA') Board of Representatives, authored a summary of the U.S v. Miller case and the full text is available on CLA's website. This write-up was originally published in Westlaw's Commercial Finance Newsletter.

Resources

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More