ARTICLE
23 June 2025

United States v. Miller: U.S. Supreme Court Narrows The Scope Of Sovereign Immunity Abrogation Under Section 106(a)

GG
Greenberg Glusker LLP

Contributor

Greenberg Glusker is a full-service law firm serving the needs of businesses, organizations, and individuals globally for over 65 years. Our wide variety of practice areas include: Bankruptcy, Reorganization & Capital Recovery; Corporate; Cybersecurity & Data Privacy; Employment; Entertainment; Environment; Intellectual Property; International; Litigation; Private Client Services; Real Estate; and Tax.
The United States Supreme Court has held that the sovereign immunity waiver in Section 106(a) of the Bankruptcy Code does not extend to state law claims...
United States Insolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring
Greenberg Glusker LLP are most popular:
  • within Government and Public Sector topic(s)
  • with readers working within the Aerospace & Defence industries

The United States Supreme Court has held that the sovereign immunity waiver in Section 106(a) of the Bankruptcy Code does not extend to state law claims "nested" within a Section 544(b) claim for relief, depriving bankruptcy trustees of the right to sue the United States under state law to avoid prepetition fraudulent transfers of debtor funds. United States v. Miller, 604 U.S. ___, 145 S.Ct. 839 (2025).

Partner Uzzi Raanan, a past Business Law Section (BLS) representative to the California Lawyers Association's (CLA') Board of Representatives, authored a summary of the U.S v. Miller case and the full text is available on CLA's website. This write-up was originally published in Westlaw's Commercial Finance Newsletter.

Resources

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More