India: New Technology

Generative artificial intelligence (“Gen-AI”) is an idea whose time has come. It is no more the future of technology but its present. Gen-AI is today being used in every aspect of our professional, business, and personal lives. As with the advent of every technological development, the world is finding itself in a vacuum on existing regulations to streamline and regulate the scope of such technology.

GCC organizations keep expanding the way most successful businesses do. First, a holding company is incorporated in the UAE. It opens a branch in Saudi Arabia. Another entity follows in Bahrain or Qatar. At each stage, the finance team sets up a fresh Zoho Books organization to manage the accounts of that entity. It's a smart, practical choice, and it serves each entity well on its own. A well-planned Zoho Books setup becomes even more valuable as the organization expands across multiple Gulf markets.

On 24 July 2026, a single judge of the Delhi High Court, Justice Amit Bansal, dismissed the interim injunction application filed by the Indian news agency Asian News International (ANI) against OpenAI. The decision is the first substantive judicial engagement in India with the central legal question of the generative-AI era: whether ingesting copyright-protected material to train a large language model (LLM) infringes the rights of the content owner.

Can artificial intelligence legally own a fashion design it creates? Indian copyright law offers no clear answer, leaving designers, brands, and AI developers in a legal vacuum where neither the training process nor the resulting creations have settled ownership rules. This article examines how generative AI exposes fundamental gaps in India's fragmented fashion IP framework, where copyright and design protection actively displace each other, and proposes legislative reforms to address the dual authorship c

As employees adapt to utilizing AI technologies in generating their work output, there exists a major disconnect among IP laws (both globally and in India) regarding who owns the copyright, patent, or trade secret in a work that was produced using AI technologies. Is it the employer, employee, or AI tool provider; all three parties could have an interest in these types of works?

The Copyright Office of India has updated its Form XIV application framework, requiring applicants of AI-assisted works to proactively upload clear documentation proving substantial human creative direction, selection, and arrangement to establish legal authorship. This article analyses the new requirement, its implications for creators and AI developers, and the emerging standards for copyright protection of AI-assisted works in India.

The Supreme Court’s recent decision in the NSE Co-Location Case has emerged as one of the most important developments in Indian competition law and abuse of dominance jurisprudence in recent years.

India's copyright framework, built on human authorship, faces unprecedented challenges as AI systems autonomously compose music.

Given the increased proliferation of Artificial Intelligence (AI) across various industries and markets, regulatory scrutiny around application of AI has been rather inevitable. This reflects in Advertising Standards Council of India’s (ASCI) Draft Guidelines for Responsible Labelling of AI-Generated Content in Advertising published on 8 May 2026 (Draft ASCI Guidelines).