China: Arbitration & Dispute Resolution

Subscribe
Litigation law, mediation law, and arbitrage law thought leadership, articles, podcasts, videos and webinars from expert sources across the legal world. Explore insights covering civil law, class actions, dispute resolution, libel and defamation and more in relation to litigation, mediation and arbitration.
Article
《最高人民法院关于审理建设工程施工合同纠纷案件适用法律问题的解释(二)》新旧条文对比分析
China's Supreme People's Court has issued a comprehensive new judicial interpretation for construction contract disputes, effective June 30, 2026. This interpretation fundamentally reshapes key areas including contractor payment rights, quality assurance mechanisms, and priority claim procedures. The new rules significantly restrict direct claims by subcontractors against project owners while strengthening protections for legitimate contractors and migrant workers.
China Commercial
JT
Beijing Jincheng Tongda & Neal Law Firm
Article
Supreme Court: How Should Compensation Be Determined For Continuing Infringement During Prior Litigation?
A Chinese patent infringement case examines whether damages for continuing infringement during prior litigation proceedings should be included in subsequent lawsuits. The Supreme People's Court clarifies the principles for determining damages calculation periods when a patentee files multiple lawsuits against the same infringer, addressing the scope of prior judgments and the treatment of ongoing infringing acts discovered during litigation.
China IP
AC
AFD China
Article
The Hong Kong Intermediary Trap: Do Not Bind The Wrong China Company
Foreign buyers often prefer dealing with Hong Kong intermediaries for China manufacturing due to clearer communication and familiar processes, but this convenience can become a costly trap. When mainland Chinese factories control your molds, technical files, and production while your contract only binds a Hong Kong entity, you may discover too late that you've legally protected the wrong company—leaving you without recourse when quality issues, IP theft, or tooling disputes arise.
Worldwide Commercial
HS
Harris Sliwoski
Article
最高法裁定:方法专利侵权案中,设备组装调试地可作为有效管辖连结点
The Supreme People's Court establishes a groundbreaking jurisdictional rule for method patent infringement cases involving large-scale equipment that requires on-site assembly and commissioning. This ruling addresses whether the location where equipment is assembled and debugged can serve as a valid jurisdictional connection point when the alleged infringement involves a method patent embedded in the equipment's operation.
China IP
AC
AFD China
See more