China: Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Subscribe
Litigation law, mediation law, and arbitrage law thought leadership, articles, podcasts, videos and webinars from expert sources across the legal world. Explore insights covering civil law, class actions, dispute resolution, libel and defamation and more in relation to litigation, mediation and arbitration.
Article
拒执罪司法实践中律师角色赋能与机制优化以刑民协同治理为视角
近年来,我国民商事案件执行问题虽经司法改革持续纾解,但被执行人恶意转移财产、逃避隐匿等拒执行为仍较为多发,既挑战司法权威,也损害了当事人合法权益。拒不执行判决、裁定罪(简称“拒执罪”)作为破解民商事案件执行问题的重要刑事法条,却因司法认定标准模糊、刑民衔接ߎ
China Litigation
JT
Beijing Jincheng Tongda & Neal Law Firm
See more

Related Country Guides

See more
Article
SPC Released Guiding Cases On Boosting Judicial IP Protection For Technological Innovation
China's Supreme People's Court has released seven guiding cases that establish new precedents for intellectual property protection, addressing critical issues from trade secret theft through employee poaching to malicious patent litigation. These landmark rulings introduce detailed enforcement mechanisms, clarify liability standards for online seed sales platforms, and strengthen remedies for copyright holders facing evidence obstruction.
China IP
PP
Panawell & Partners
Article
拒执罪司法实践中律师角色赋能与机制优化以刑民协同治理为视角
近年来,我国民商事案件执行问题虽经司法改革持续纾解,但被执行人恶意转移财产、逃避隐匿等拒执行为仍较为多发,既挑战司法权威,也损害了当事人合法权益。拒不执行判决、裁定罪(简称“拒执罪”)作为破解民商事案件执行问题的重要刑事法条,却因司法认定标准模糊、刑民衔接ߎ
China Litigation
JT
Beijing Jincheng Tongda & Neal Law Firm
See more
Article
The Principle Of Holistic Assessment Of Inventiveness In Light Of Technical Feature Synergy
The Supreme People's Court has issued a landmark ruling clarifying that patent inventiveness must be assessed holistically, considering all technical features and their coordination relationships together rather than evaluating each feature in isolation. This decision addresses a critical methodological question in patent examination: how should reviewing bodies properly evaluate the inventive contribution of interconnected technical features to avoid the trap of hindsight reasoning?
China IP
AC
AFD China
Article
Punitive Damages In Intellectual Property Civil Cases
China's Supreme People's Court has issued a comprehensive 2026 Interpretation that fundamentally reshapes the punitive damages landscape for intellectual property disputes. The new framework introduces stricter procedural requirements, clearer standards for proving intentional infringement, and detailed methodologies for calculating damages multipliers. How will these refined rules impact litigation strategy and enforcement outcomes for rights holders operating in China's evolving IP regime?
China IP
SF
Spruson & Ferguson
See more
See more