Worldwide: Arbitration & Dispute Resolution

One of the most effective steps a community association board can take to protect the Association from costly litigation is to request legal review of contracts before engagement with vendors...

A: Yes, using a uniform separation agreement may be efficient, but it can create legal exposure if not carefully tailored. Below are key considerations that will help employers ensure their separation agreements are legally compliant.

When geopolitical tensions escalate into real-world disruptions, commercial performance can become delayed, constrained or impossible. Conflicts can threaten shipping lanes, create port constraints and lead...

As discussed in our March 31 bulletin, Executive Order 14398 (“EO 14398”) instructed federal agencies to prohibit contractors and subcontractors from engaging in diversity, equity, and inclusion (“DEI”)...

As cross-border insolvencies continue to evolve, a notable shift is emerging in how complex restructurings are being executed.

On April 6, 2026, the Colorado Supreme Court held in Ralph L. Wadsworth Construction Co., LLC v. Regional Rail Partners, 2026 CO 19, that subcontractors on public projects may seek recovery of disputed or unliquidated amounts—including delay and disruption damages—in verified statements of claim under the Public Works Act. The Court also clarified that the penalty for filing an excessive claim is forfeiture of statutory remedies only, leaving common law claims available.

Following the Supreme Court's reversal of a billion-dollar copyright verdict against Cox Communications, courts are now grappling with what level of knowledge and intent makes technology platforms liable for user...

In a short but precedential opinion, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the invalidation of certain asserted claims of U.S. Patent No. 10,912,321 (the “'321 Patent”).

A bankruptcy court in New York's Southern District granted a stay on its dismissal order for a case filed in bad faith, but imposed a substantial $3 million bond requirement on the debtor during the appeal period. This ruling provides important guidance for secured creditors seeking to protect their state law remedies when debtors attempt to use bankruptcy filings as a delaying tactic.