Bloomberg Law Podcast: Can Employers "Directly Observe" Drug Testing Of Their Employees?

The world’s leading organizations and global players choose Proskauer to represent them when they need it the most. Our top tier team of star trial attorneys, acclaimed transactional lawyers and exceptionally talented partners and associates have earned a reputation for the relentless pursuit of perfection and a dauntless pursuit of success.

Explore Firm Details

Recently, the Ohio Supreme Court ruled that employees had no claim for invasion of privacy when a drug-testing facility "directly observed" them as they provided a urine sample.

United States Employment and HR

Article Insights

Anthony J. Oncidi’s articles from Proskauer Rose LLP are most popular:

within Employment and HR topic(s)
with Senior Company Executives, HR and Inhouse Counsel
with readers working within the Business & Consumer Services, Insurance and Utilities industries

Recently, the Ohio Supreme Court ruled that employees had no claim for invasion of privacy when a drug-testing facility "directly observed" them as they provided a urine sample. Proskauer's Anthony Oncidi joins Bloomberg Law podcast host June Grasso to discuss the ruling's significance and what it means for employers.

Listen to the podcast here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Bloomberg Law Podcast: Can Employers "Directly Observe" Drug Testing Of Their Employees?

Contributor

Employment and HR

Contributor

United States