ARTICLE
28 July 2026

Menstrual Leave Update By Karnataka HC

AP
AZB & Partners

Contributor

AZB & Partners is one of India's premier law firms with 500+ lawyers and offices across the country. The firm was founded in 2004 with a clear purpose to provide reliable, practical and full–service advice to clients, across all sectors. Having grown steadily since its inception, AZB & Partners now has offices across Mumbai, Delhi, Bangalore, Pune and Chennai. We are recognized by most international publications for our legal expertise.
The Karnataka High Court has directed strict implementation of the state's menstrual leave policy, which mandates one day of paid leave per month for women employees across various sectors. While the court has ordered the government to operationalize the policy through administrative guidelines, the matter remains legally contested with pending writ petitions challenging the validity of the menstrual leave order before the Principal Bench.
India Employment and HR
AZB & Partners are most popular:
  • within Strategy, Environment and Antitrust/Competition Law topic(s)
  • with readers working within the Law Firm industries

The State of Karnataka, by way of a Government Order dated November 12, 2025, had mandated the Statewide provision of one day of paid menstrual leave per month (restricted to 12 days per year) to all permanent, contract, and outsourced women employees aged between 18 and 52 years employed in establishments registered under the erstwhile Factories Act, 1948, the Karnataka Shops and Commercial Establishments Act, 1961, the Plantation Labour Act, 1951, the Beedi and Cigar Workers (Conditions of Employment) Act, 1966, and the Motor Transport Workers Act, 1961.

In a recent development, on April 15, 2026, the Karnataka HC (Dharwad Bench), in its judgement in the case of Smt. Chandravva Hanamant Gokavi v. State of Karnataka & Ors.1 directed the strict implementation of the existing menstrual leave policy and instructed the State to ensure its effective operationalisation through guidelines, circulars, and administrative instructions across all sectors. However, this matter continues to remain sub-judice because the writ petitions that have been filed before the Principal Bench of the Karnataka HC challenging the validity of this menstrual leave Order, continue to remain pending.

Footnote

1. Smt. Chandravva Hanamant Gokavi v. State of Karnataka & Ors. W.P. No. 109734 of 2025.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More