ARTICLE
10 September 2026

Robbie Mashburn Discusses 401(k) Investment Rules In The Wall Street Journal

LL
Liskow & Lewis

Contributor

Liskow is a full-service law firm providing regulatory advice, transactional counsel, and handling high-stakes litigation for regional and national companies. Liskow lawyers are strategically located across the gulf coast region and serve clients in the energy, environmental, and maritime sectors, as well as local and regional businesses in virtually all industries.
The Labor Department faces a regulatory dilemma as it moves to restrict ESG considerations in 401(k) plans while simultaneously seeking to expand access to private-market investments. This tension creates uncertainty for plan sponsors who must navigate conflicting policy objectives, particularly as many private investment strategies inherently incorporate both financial returns and social or environmental goals.
United States Employment and HR
Liskow & Lewis are most popular:
  • with Finance and Tax Executives
  • with readers working within the Accounting & Consultancy, Chemicals and Environment & Waste Management industries

In an article published by The Wall Street Journal, Liskow attorney Robbie Mashburn examines the tension between two Labor Department rulemakings governing 401(k) plan investment offerings.

The Labor Department is expected to propose repealing rules that allowed plan administrators to weigh environmental, social, and corporate governance factors, likely requiring sponsors to focus solely on financial, or “pecuniary,” considerations. At the same time, a separate Labor Department proposal aims to expand 401(k) plans’ access to private-market investments, an objective that could be complicated by a strict ESG-exclusion rule, given that many private strategies pursue both financial returns and social or environmental goals.

Robbie, who focuses on employee benefits and compensation, explains how ERISA’s duty of loyalty frames the analysis, noting that plan sponsors must be careful not to do anything that may not be beneficial to their plan participants on a financial basis. He also offers a measured prediction on where the rulemaking may land: rather than prohibiting ESG-type assets outright, the DOL may be more likely to require that sponsors demonstrate they are looking after the financial interests of the participants.

To read the full article, click here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More