Germany: Court Procedure

Subscribe
Litigation law, mediation law, and arbitrage law thought leadership, articles, podcasts, videos and webinars from expert sources across the legal world. Explore insights covering civil law, class actions, dispute resolution, libel and defamation and more in relation to litigation, mediation and arbitration.
Article
CoA, July 22, 2026, Order – Admissibility Of New Auxiliary Requests On Appeal Not Determined In Advance, UPC-CoA-63/2026 & UPC-CoA-64/2026
The Unified Patent Court's Court of Appeal issued a procedural order addressing the admissibility of additional auxiliary requests in parallel appeals brought by Advanced Brain Monitoring against Philips entities. The decision interprets Article 73(4) UPCA and Rule 222.2 RoP in the context of patent revocation proceedings involving EP 2 437 696 B2.
Germany IP
BP
Bardehle Pagenberg
Article
Central Division Munich, July 21, 2026, Decision – Device Claim Defined By Structure Lacks Novelty Regardless Of Function; No Obvious Typographical Error In Prior Art Where The Term Used Is Technically Plausible; UPC_CFI_714/2025
A nullity action has been filed at the Unified Patent Court's Central Division Munich challenging the validity of a unitary patent held by BAUSSMANN Collated Fasteners GmbH. The case, brought by Austrian company Raimund Beck Nageltechnik GmbH, concerns European Patent EP 4 283 140 B1 and will be heard by Panel 1 under the procedural rules governing patent nullity proceedings.
Germany IP
BP
Bardehle Pagenberg
Article
Court Of Appeal, July 16, 2026, Order, UPC-CoA-42/2026
The Court of Appeal addresses whether the deadline for submitting a Statement of response to an appeal can be extended when new information becomes available after the Statement of grounds of appeal was received. This procedural decision involves an appeal between Fives ECL and REEL GmbH concerning European Patent EP 1 740 740, examining the application of specific UPCA articles and Rules of Procedure governing extension of time limits in UPC appeal proceedings.
Germany Litigation
BP
Bardehle Pagenberg
Article
"Cram Down" – Cross-Class Plan Approval In Insolvency Proceedings
Pre-insolvency restructurings can fail when individual creditors block viable solutions to negotiate better outcomes. The insolvency plan's cram-down mechanism enables court confirmation despite dissenting votes, provided dissenting groups receive legal protection and aren't unduly disadvantaged. Understanding cram-down logic helps stakeholders assess restructuring options and risks before insolvency occurs.
Germany Insolvency
MB
Mayer Brown
See more