Germany: Court Procedure

Dyson Technology Limited has filed an application for provisional measures at the UPC Hamburg against multiple Dreame entities and distributors, involving European Patent 3,119,235. The case raises questions about jurisdiction under the Brussels I recast regulation and the interplay between UPC procedural rules and EU regulations in cross-border patent disputes.

As a general rule, an order to produce evidence (e.g. source codes) presupposes that a fact is relevant to substantiate claims or objections.

A concurrence of the deadlines for the reply to the Statement of defense and the Defense to a Counterclaim for revocation...