Worldwide: Court Procedure

TOLATA is the statute that gives the court the power to make orders regulating property ownership, occupation, or use when two or more people own property together.

The Court removed the executor due to his failure to address a serious conflict of interest arising between his personal interests and his role as executor for a period of over ten years and also for the potentially...

In The Alion (Tanga Pharmaceuticals Plastics Limited and others v Emirates Shipping Line FZE [2025] EWHC 368 (Comm)), handed down today, the Commercial Court rejected an attempt...

In one case, Mr Wittmer bought polished tiles from Weber which turned out to be defective once laid.

Manufacturers and distributors of goods in, and into, the United Kingdom and other EU member states will be familiar with the framework governing liability in the event that those goods cause damage or injury to consumers.

This article begins a journey, one that begins to look at the concept of innovation in the field of providing legal services. The field that I explore is that in which the liability lawyer is camped. The article poses some questions for debate. I offer no single answer but hope, reader that you will be patient and understand why that is the case.

In the case of Phi Group Ltd v Robert West Consulting, [2012] EWCA Civ 588, the Court of Appeal considered the requirements of Part 36 offers and overturned a costs decision in the Technology & Construction Court (‘TCC’).

A recent Court of Appeal case caught the eye of Attwells' litigators who, from their offices in St. John's Wood, are frequently called upon to advise in relation to management issues arising from high value residential bocks of flats.

This case involved a tripartite agreement for the sale of two plots of land between Bett Homes Ltd ("Bett"), East Dunbartonshire Council ("the Council") and Glasgow University ("the University").

TOLATA is the statute that gives the court the power to make orders regulating property ownership, occupation, or use when two or more people own property together.

In Rukhadze v Recovery Partners GP Ltd, the Supreme Court recently revisited the previously settled law regarding a fiduciary's duty to account for an unauthorised profit.

The Court removed the executor due to his failure to address a serious conflict of interest arising between his personal interests and his role as executor for a period of over ten years and also for the potentially...