ARTICLE
30 April 2025

UK-Based Graffiti Artists Dismiss Their US Lawsuit Against Vivienne Westwood

KM
Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP

Contributor

Katten is a firm of first choice for clients seeking sophisticated, high-value legal services globally. Our nationally and internationally recognized practices include corporate, financial markets and funds, insolvency and restructuring, intellectual property, litigation, real estate, structured finance and securitization, transactional tax planning, private credit and private wealth.
UK-based graffiti artists filed a lawsuit against Vivienne Westwood for allegedly using their street art without permission on fashion apparel, raising complex questions about copyright protection for potentially illegal artwork. The case, which centered on whether graffiti created without building owners' consent could be legally protected under US law, has now been dismissed with prejudice following a joint stipulation by both parties.
United States Intellectual Property
Asena Baran’s articles from Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP are most popular:
  • with readers working within the Business & Consumer Services and Transport industries
Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP are most popular:
  • within Insurance, Strategy and International Law topic(s)

We have previously reported on the lawsuit that UK-based graffiti artists Cole Smith, Reece Deardon and Harry Matthews filed against Vivienne Westwood and retailers of the brand for the British fashion house's allegedly unauthorized use of their tags "to lend credibility and an air of urban cool" to its apparel. Smith v. Vivienne Westwood, Inc., Case No. 2:25-cv-01221 (C.D. Cal. Filed 02/12/25)

The plaintiffs, known professionally as DISA, SNOK and RENNEE, respectively, claimed that Vivienne Westwood used images of their graffiti to adorn items of clothing without permission. In our previous reporting, we raised a number of key questions about the viability of the plaintiffs' claims, including whether the artwork, which likely was not commissioned by the owners of the buildings on which it appeared, would be considered illegal and therefore not protectible under US law.

On April 30, the plaintiffs and Vivienne Westwood jointly filed a stipulation to dismiss the entire action with prejudice, with each of the parties bearing its own attorneys' fees and costs. The court filing is silent as to whether the dismissal was part of a more comprehensive settlement agreement, whether any money changed hands or whether the fashion house agreed to discontinue its sales of the offending apparel. In any event, so ends the most recent dispute between so-called "street artists" and retailers that lies at the intersection of graffiti, fashion and advertising.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More