Australia: Personal Injury

Subscribe
Litigation law, mediation law, and arbitrage law thought leadership, articles, podcasts, videos and webinars from expert sources across the legal world. Explore insights covering civil law, class actions, dispute resolution, libel and defamation and more in relation to litigation, mediation and arbitration.
Article
Failure To Warn But Is It Medical Negligence?
In the recent decision by the Supreme Court of New South Wales (the Court), in Stott v Rashid[1], Justice Fagan held that proving that a practitioner failed to warn a patient of a material risk of a procedure is only half the battle in medical negligence cases. The plaintiff must also establish, on the balance of probabilities (i.e. more likely than not), that had they been advised of the risks, they would have declined the procedure (causation issue).
Australia Healthcare
K
Kennedys
Article
Scope Of Non-Delegable Duties Of Care Refined
In a landmark decision, the High Court of Australia determined that a non-delegable duty of care may be breached by the intentional conduct of a delegate, overturning longstanding authority of New South Wales v Lepore (2003) 212 CLR 511, which found that a common law non-delegable duty could not arise in respect of harm caused by an intentional criminal act. The decision significantly refines the scope and operation of non-delegable duties in Australian law.
Australia Litigation
K
Kennedys
Article
Limitation Has Its Limits: The High Court Of Australia Confirms Wreck-Removal Claims Are Not Limitable In Australia
The High Court of Australia has handed down judgment in the much-anticipated decision of CSL Australia Pty Ltd v Tasmanian Ports Corporation Pty Ltd [2026] HCA 15 (The Goliath). It has unanimously dismissed CSL Australia Pty Ltd’s appeal. As such, under Australian law, a shipowner cannot limit its liability for wreck removal expenses under the Convention on Limitation of Liability for Maritime Claims 1976.
Australia Transport
K
Kennedys
See more