ARTICLE
29 July 2016

I think my ex-partner is hiding assets – what should I do?

HL
HHG Legal Group

Contributor

HHG Legal Group has been serving Western Australians for over 100 years. With a large team across five offices, we offer top-notch legal advice and representation, exceeding expectations for all clients.
Before settlement, parties must provide full and frank disclosure of all relevant financial information and documents.
Australia Family and Matrimonial
Simon Creek’s articles from HHG Legal Group are most popular:
  • with readers working within the Business & Consumer Services and Retail & Leisure industries
HHG Legal Group are most popular:
  • within Government, Public Sector, Corporate/Commercial Law, Litigation and Mediation & Arbitration topic(s)
  • with Senior Company Executives and HR

When partners separate and move to finalise the division of their finances, the fact that one party played a greater role in the management of the financial affairs of the relationship is a common cause of conflict.

Parties often find themselves in a situation where their 'ex' knows more about their joint finances than they do. Commonly in this situation, the party has suspicions that the other is hiding assets, and that they will get the 'rough end of the stick' in a property settlement.

Fortunately, the rules of the Family Court clearly state that before reaching settlement or commencing Court proceedings, both parties must provide full and frank disclosure of all relevant financial information and documents.

This includes evidence of any income and earnings; property and business interests, including trusts and shares; and savings and investments.

In addition, any documents or records that evidence a party has disposed of assets or incurred debts must also be disclosed.

If a party refuses to provide documents, the other party can apply to the Family Court for an Order compelling their disclosure. Failing to provide documents after an Order is granted by the Court is a serious offence, with severe penalties, including imprisonment.

Even after an agreement has been reached, if a party discovers that the other party concealed an asset, then the original agreement may be set aside by the Court. In this scenario, misled parties are likely to be awarded costs in new settlement proceedings.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More