Canada: Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Subscribe
Litigation law, mediation law, and arbitrage law thought leadership, articles, podcasts, videos and webinars from expert sources across the legal world. Explore insights covering civil law, class actions, dispute resolution, libel and defamation and more in relation to litigation, mediation and arbitration.
Article
Quand les tarifs douaniers menacent les relations commerciales : une nouvelle application de l’arbitrage international
La récente rupture des négociations commerciales entre le Canada et les États-Unis ainsi que les mesures tarifaires qui ont suivi ont amené les entreprises canadiennes à revoir leur façon de gérer leurs échanges commerciaux transfrontaliers. Si la hausse des coûts représente l’enjeu le plus immédiat, le véritable défi tient plutôt à l’imprévisibilité de la situation, qui pourrait bien s’inscrire dans la durée.
Canada Litigation
FF
Fasken (French)
Article
Court Of Appeal Of Québec: International Commercial Arbitration Agreement Enforceable Despite Absence Of Mandatory Language
The Court of Appeal of Québec recently enforced an international arbitration clause despite its use of permissive rather than mandatory language. This decision clarifies how Canadian courts interpret dispute resolution clauses in cross-border commercial agreements, particularly when parties use imperfect wording like "may" instead of "shall." The ruling emphasizes that courts will look beyond literal language to the broader context and intent of international parties seeking legal certainty through arb
Global Litigation
BJ
Bennett Jones LLP
Article
Ontario Court Of Appeal Updates Framework For Leave To Appeal From Divisional Court Decisions
The Ontario Court of Appeal has established a new two-part framework for granting leave to appeal from Divisional Court decisions, replacing the fifty-year-old Sault Dock test. The updated approach requires both an arguable question of law or mixed fact and law, and sufficient public importance to warrant appellate consideration, while eliminating the historical distinction between cases arising from original versus appellate jurisdiction.
Canada Litigation
OH
Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
See more
Article
La preuve à l’ère des hypertrucages : comment les hypertrucages compliquent l’évaluation de la preuve numérique devant les tribunaux
L'intelligence artificielle générative permet désormais de créer des hypertrucages si réalistes qu'ils menacent l'intégrité des preuves numériques présentées devant les tribunaux. Les cadres d'authentification traditionnels, conçus avant l'avènement de cette technologie, sont-ils encore suffisants pour garantir la fiabilité des photographies, vidéos et enregistrements audio produits en preuve? Les avocats doivent maintenant adopter de nou
Canada Litigation
MT
Miller Thomson LLP
See more
Article
Quand les tarifs douaniers menacent les relations commerciales : une nouvelle application de l’arbitrage international
La récente rupture des négociations commerciales entre le Canada et les États-Unis ainsi que les mesures tarifaires qui ont suivi ont amené les entreprises canadiennes à revoir leur façon de gérer leurs échanges commerciaux transfrontaliers. Si la hausse des coûts représente l’enjeu le plus immédiat, le véritable défi tient plutôt à l’imprévisibilité de la situation, qui pourrait bien s’inscrire dans la durée.
Canada Litigation
FF
Fasken (French)
Article
Court Of Appeal Of Québec: International Commercial Arbitration Agreement Enforceable Despite Absence Of Mandatory Language
The Court of Appeal of Québec recently enforced an international arbitration clause despite its use of permissive rather than mandatory language. This decision clarifies how Canadian courts interpret dispute resolution clauses in cross-border commercial agreements, particularly when parties use imperfect wording like "may" instead of "shall." The ruling emphasizes that courts will look beyond literal language to the broader context and intent of international parties seeking legal certainty through arb
Global Litigation
BJ
Bennett Jones LLP
Article
Ontario Court Of Appeal: Insurance Coverage Analysis Turns On Nature Of Loss, Not Coverage Grant Selected
The Ontario Court of Appeal's decision in Panasonic Canada Inc. v. XL Specialty Insurance Company establishes that coverage analysis must focus on the true nature of the loss rather than the coverage provision an insured selects. When a ransomware endorsement contains specific language governing losses connected to cyber-extortion threats, that endorsement may control the claim even when the insured seeks recovery under different policy provisions and never paid a ransom.
Canada Insurance
BL
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
See more
Article
Court Of Appeal Of Québec: International Commercial Arbitration Agreement Enforceable Despite Absence Of Mandatory Language
The Court of Appeal of Québec recently enforced an international arbitration clause despite its use of permissive rather than mandatory language. This decision clarifies how Canadian courts interpret dispute resolution clauses in cross-border commercial agreements, particularly when parties use imperfect wording like "may" instead of "shall." The ruling emphasizes that courts will look beyond literal language to the broader context and intent of international parties seeking legal certainty through arb
Global Litigation
BJ
Bennett Jones LLP
Article
Ontario Court Of Appeal Updates Framework For Leave To Appeal From Divisional Court Decisions
The Ontario Court of Appeal has established a new two-part framework for granting leave to appeal from Divisional Court decisions, replacing the fifty-year-old Sault Dock test. The updated approach requires both an arguable question of law or mixed fact and law, and sufficient public importance to warrant appellate consideration, while eliminating the historical distinction between cases arising from original versus appellate jurisdiction.
Canada Litigation
OH
Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
See more
See more