Current filters:  
United States
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
In our Augmented Reality/Virtual Reality Litigation Update series, we shine the spotlight on legal proceedings involving AR/VR technology.
Jones Day
The PTAB denied institution of a follow on petition filed five months after an initial petition by the same petitioner, even though the two petitions were directed to different claims.
McDermott Will & Emery
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit upheld a US Court of Federal Claims dismissal, rejecting arguments that patent infringement is a taking under the Fifth Amendment. Golden v. United States, Case No. 19-2134 ...
Shipman & Goodwin LLP
Shipman & Goodwin partners Glenn M. Cunningham and Patrick M. Fahey have been named 2020/2021 IP Stars USA
Morrison & Foerster LLP
On May 1, 2020 the last part of the German Trademark Law Modernization Act (Markenrechtsmodernisierungsgesetz – "MaMoG"), which contains practical relevant amendments to the procedural....
Ropes & Gray LLP
A few weeks back I highlighted the fact that the Patent Trial & Appeal Board (PTAB) was in the process of considering a more nuanced approach to NHK determinations.
In an April 13, 2020, decision, the Federal Circuit held that neither a voluntary dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), nor a stay of a patent lawsuit pending the results of a patent reexamination, ...
The coronavirus pandemic has created profound changes to how many Americans do their work, with an outsized number now working from home.
Last week, the PTAB designated a January 24, 2020 decision, finding objective indicia of nonobviousness, such as evidence of long-felt need and industry praise, saved a patent owner's amended claims from invalidation, as precedential.
Recently on April 14, 2020, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board ("Board") designated Ex parte Whirlpool Corp., Appeal 2013-008232 (Oct. 30, 2013) "Informative".
On Monday, in Thryv, Inc. v. Click-to-Cal Technologies, the Supreme Court held that § 315(b) time-bar determinations are not subject to judicial review.
Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz
Grammy Award-winning singer-songwriter Jason Mraz ("Mraz") and the beer brewing company MillerCoors LLC ("MillerCoors") have settled their lawsuit in the U.S. District Court
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP
On Monday, May 4, 2020, for the first time in its 231-year history, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments through a telephone conference call, allowing the attorneys to present arguments while complying with shelter-in-place orders.
Ropes & Gray LLP
Inequitable conduct is an equitable defense to patent infringement that, if proved, bars enforcement of a patent.
Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton
On March 31, 2020, the USPTO announced that it is permitting applicants, for delays that are based on the ongoing COVID-19 emergency in the United States
Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
Section 1213 of the Trademark Manual of Examining Procedure states (without cited authority) that "A disclaimer may be limited to pertain ...
Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton
Imagine a scenario where the International Trade Commission (ITC) finds a respondent infringes a standard essential patent (SEP).
Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
The US regulatory and litigation pathway for biosimilars (the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009; BPCIA)
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
In CardioNet, LLC v. InfoBionic, Inc., No. 2019-1149 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 17, 2020), the Federal Circuit reversed the district court's determination that the claims covering a device for monitoring ...
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
The following telephone arguments will be available to the public live. Access information will be available by 9 AM ET each day of argument at:
FREE News Alerts
Sign Up for our free News Alerts - All the latest articles on your chosen topics condensed into a free bi-weekly email.
Popular Contributors
Upcoming Events
Font Size:
Mondaq Social Media