ARTICLE
8 August 2016

Insurer's Broad Interpretation Of Data Breach Exclusion Rejected By Court

O
Orrick

Contributor

Orrick logo
Orrick is a global law firm focused on serving the technology & innovation, energy & infrastructure and finance sectors. Founded over 150 years ago, Orrick has offices in 25+ markets worldwide. Financial Times selected Orrick as the Most Innovative Law Firm in North America for three years in a row.
Non-cyber insurance policies often contain exclusions to limit or preclude coverage for data breaches. A Maryland federal district court recently addressed the scope of such exclusions.
United States Technology

Article by Darren S. Teshima and Harry J. Moren.

Non-cyber insurance policies often contain exclusions to limit or preclude coverage for data breaches. A Maryland federal district court recently addressed the scope of such exclusions.  The court analyzed the meaning of "data" in data breach policy exclusions in a multimedia liability policy and concluded that the undefined term "data" did not include satellite television programming. Having found that the exclusions did not apply, the court held that the underlying lawsuit involving allegations of unauthorized access to satellite television programming triggered the insurer's duty to defend the policyholder. At Orrick's Policyholder Insider blog,  Darren Teshima and Harry Moren discuss this decision's rejection of an insurer's attempt to avoid coverage by broadening the scope of these data breach exclusions.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More