ARTICLE
9 January 2025

Insurance Company Hit With TCPA Claim

KM
Klein Moynihan Turco LLP

Contributor

Klein Moynihan Turco LLP (KMT) maintains an extensive practice, with an international client base, in the rapidly developing fields of Internet, telemarketing and mobile marketing law, sweepstakes and promotions law, gambling, fantasy sports and gaming law, data and consumer privacy law, intellectual property law and general corporate law.
A recent class action lawsuit filed in a Texas federal court asserts a Telephone Consumer Protection Act ("TCPA") claim against American Family Life Assurance Company, Inc. ("AFLAC")...
United States Insurance

A recent class action lawsuit filed in a Texas federal court asserts a Telephone Consumer Protection Act ("TCPA") claim against American Family Life Assurance Company, Inc. ("AFLAC") for allegedly placing unsolicited telephone calls to consumers whose phone numbers appeared on the National Do Not Call Registry ("National DNC"). Plaintiff, whose number was on the National DNC, alleged a single TCPA claim arising from her receipt of purported unsolicited life insurance related telemarketing calls from AFLAC. We discuss the alleged facts at issue in the proceeding below.

Do Not Call TCPA Claim

In Gonzalez v. Aflac Inc.,Plaintiff Yazmin Gonzalez ("Plaintiff") sued AFLAC on behalf of herself and a putative class of consumers. In her Complaint, Plaintiff alleged that she had placed her cell phone number on the National DNC on February 15, 2022. Between July 19, 2024 and July 21, 2024, Plaintiff claimed that she received four unsolicited calls from AFLAC offering its life insurance products. To identify who the then-unidentified caller was, Plaintiff asserted that she answered and engaged with the caller during the fourth call that she received. On this call, Plaintiff alleged that the individual telemarketer initially provided Plaintiff only with his name, and then asked Plaintiff a series of questions to determine whether Plaintiff was eligible for life insurance. After hearing that she was eligible for a life insurance policy from AFLAC, Plaintiff alleged that she received a text message from the caller stating that: (1) he was Plaintiff's insurance agent; and (2) AFLAC would be (A) sending Plaintiff a code in 5-10 minutes and (B) asking for Plaintiff to provide the telemarketer with that code. While on the call, Plaintiff asked the telemarketer if he was an insurance agent with AFLAC, and the caller stated that he was. Shortly after receiving the aforementioned phone calls, Plaintiff filed a Complaint in the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas alleging that AFLAC violated the Do Not Call provisions of the TCPA.

Hire Experienced TCPA Attorneys

With the TCPA's one-to-one consent rule set to take effect on January 27, 2025, companies, if they have not already done so, need to carefully evaluate their TCPA compliance procedures. Defending TCPA claims can be extremely time consuming and expensive – violations of the TCPA carry a minimum statutory fine of $500, which can be increased to $1,500 per violation if deemed to be willful or knowing. In this rapidly-evolving TCPA legal landscape, businesses must hire experienced TCPA attorneys who stay up-to-date with the most recent case law and regulatory changes. Seasoned TCPA attorneys can help to: (1) ensure telemarketing law compliance; and (2) explore all avenues to a successful litigation defense.

Similar Blog Posts:

5 TCPA Compliance Tips

National Mortgage Company Again Under Fire For Alleged Do Not Call Violations

Newly Adopted FCC TCPA Consent Rules Set To Change The Telemarketing Industry

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More