ARTICLE
25 August 2016

Third Circuit Affirms Dismissal Of Exclusive Dealing Antitrust Suit Against Hospital And Physician Group

M
Mintz

Contributor

Mintz is a litigation powerhouse and business accelerator serving leaders in life sciences, private equity, sustainable energy, and technology. The world’s most innovative companies trust Mintz to provide expert advice, protect and monetize their IP, negotiate deals, source financing, and solve complex legal challenges. The firm has over 600 attorneys across offices in Boston, Los Angeles, Miami, New York, Washington, DC, San Francisco, San Diego, and Toronto.
The Third Circuit affirmed a lower court's dismissal of a suit filed by a hospital alleging an illegal exclusive dealing arrangement by a competing hospital and physician group.
United States Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences

Last week, in Deborah Heart & Lung Center v. Virtua Health, Inc., the Third Circuit affirmed a lower court's dismissal of a suit filed by a hospital alleging an illegal exclusive dealing arrangement by a competing hospital and physician group for referrals made by the defendants to a third hospital rather than to the plaintiff hospital. In its decision, the court emphasized the importance of market definitions in antitrust cases, and clarified an antitrust plaintiff's burden when alleging a Sherman Act Section 1 claim with no allegation of market power. The court held that anticompetitive effects in those cases must then be shown on the relevant market as a whole, not only on a small subset of the market. In a Health Care Antitrust Alert, our antitrust colleagues Bruce Sokler and Farrah Short analyze the Third Circuit's decision.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More