- Sitting en banc, the First Circuit vacated a key portion of its prior panel decision and affirmed the district court's dismissal of the SEC's Section 10(b)/Rule 10b- 5 claim against two mutual fund underwriters.
- The court rejected the SEC's argument that a person who uses a false statement drafted by others to sell securities is liable for "making" that statement under Rule 10b-5.
- While this ruling closes one door to primary violator liability, others doors may yet remain open depending on the specific allegations of each case, and the First Circuit declined to choose sides in the current circuit split regarding the scope of primary liability.
Excerpt:
The First Circuit's en banc ruling in SEC v. Tambone, No.
07-1384 (Mar. 10, 2010), vacated a key part of a prior ruling by a
three-judge panel, and provides important guidance on the scope
of
"primary violator" liability under Section 10(b) of the
1934 Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder...
(continues)
Download the Foley Hoag Business Crimes Perspectives - March 2010 Issue(.pdf)
Foley Hoag's Business Crimes Perspectives is a regular publication exploring trends and emerging issues in the areas of business crimes, fraud and government investigations. Lawyers in Foley Hoag's Business Crimes practice represent corporations, officers, directors, and other individuals in criminal, administrative, regulatory and civil proceedings. If you find this update useful, please encourage your colleagues and contacts to visit us at foleyhoag.com.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.