On November 8, the SEC and an investment advisor entered into a settlement to resolve an administrative proceeding featuring allegations of greenwashing. Specifically, the investment advisor was alleged to have made "misleading statements concerning the company-wide percentage of assets under management . . . that was 'ESG integrated,' [meaning the investment] incorporat[ed] [] environmental, social, and governance considerations into [the] investment decision making processes." In other words, the investment advisor claimed to have more funds invested in ESG-focused assets than it actually did. Notably, to resolve these alleged violations, the investment advisor agreed to pay a $17.5 million penalty.
This enforcement action is significant for a number of reasons. First, the mere existence of this enforcement action demonstrates the SEC's continued focus on greenwashing issues even after the disbandment of the SEC's Climate & ESG task force. Second, the considerable size of the fine indicates an appetite for major enforcement actions in this space. Third, the nature of the allegations--that an investment adviser made "representations . . . that . . . were overstated" and "failed to adopt and implement reasonably designed policies and procedures"--may illustrate the type of enforcement action that the SEC may bring, irrespective of the upcoming change in administrations. (Pursuing an enforcement action against an entity for misstatements is a classic task within the remit of the SEC, and does not require that the SEC adopt any particular position on the underlying merits of the issues about which the company chose to disclose.) In other words, this enforcement action may offer considerable insight into the SEC's playbook for future enforcement actions concerning allegations of greenwashing.
The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged Invesco Advisers, Inc. for making misleading statements about the percentage of company-wide assets under management that integrated environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors in investment decisions. The Atlanta-based registered investment adviser agreed to pay a $17.5 million civil penalty to settle the SEC's charges. According to the SEC's order, from 2020 to 2022, Invesco told clients and stated in marketing materials that between 70 and 94 percent of its parent company's assets under management were "ESG integrated." However, in reality, these percentages included a substantial amount of assets that were held in passive ETFs that did not consider ESG factors in investment decisions. Furthermore, the SEC's order found that Invesco lacked any written policy defining ESG integration.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
