India: Employment Litigation/ Tribunals

Subscribe
Employment law and labour law articles and thought leadership, podcasts, videos and webinars from expert sources across the legal world. Explore articles covering topics such as Discrimination, Employee Benefits and Compensation, Health and Safety, Unfair/Wrongful Dismissal, Whistleblowing, Employment Rights, Outsourcing and Redundancy.
Article
The Contractual Trap; How The Supreme Court Is Dismantling Decades Of Exploitative Public Employment
There is a practice so entrenched in Indian public administration that it has become almost invisible. A government body needs workers. Instead of following the constitutionally mandated process of open recruitment, it hires on contract, daily wages, or ad hoc terms. Years pass. Sometimes decades. The worker performs the same duties as a regular employee, sits at the same desk, reports to the same officer, and keeps the institution running. On paper, however, they remain ‘contractual’. No pension. No provident fund. No job security. No career progression.
India Employment
Foresight Law Offices
Article
High Court Of Delhi Held That An Employer Cannot Continue To Pay Stagnant Wages Under Section 17-B Of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Despite Periodic Revision Of Minimum Wages By The Government
The High Court of Delhi, through its Judgment dated 18.05.2026 in the matter of Moolchand Khairati Ram Hospital v. Vijender Singh & Ors., inter alia, held that the obligation under Section 17-B of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (“ID Act”) is a continuing statutory obligation and takes into account the minimum wages revised from time to time by the Appropriate Government.
India Employment
Sagus Legal
Article
High Court Of Delhi Holds That The Place Of Employment And The Termination Are The Determinative Factors For Deciding The Territorial Jurisdiction Under The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
The High Court of Delhi through its Judgment dated 11.05.2026 in Rajeshwar Dayal Aggarwal v. M/s. Enicar Machine (India) upheld the Award passed by the Labour Court (“Award”) holding that the Government of NCT of Delhi was not the “Appropriate Government” competent to make the reference for adjudication of the industrial dispute, since Mr. Rajeshwar was employed and allegedly terminated at Faridabad, Haryana.
India Employment
Sagus Legal
See more