Sometimes during the negotiations for a separation agreement the employee will ask for a mutual release of claims and an indemnity from the employer as well as a confidentiality obligation. What should the employer consider before agreeing to this request?
- Know what you are giving
away: It is important to know what you are giving away in
terms of a release of potential claims against the employee. As an
employer you do not want to provide the employee with a release of
claims only to subsequently discover that these are substantial
claims or ones which the employer ought to have pursued against the
employee or would have meant a different approach to negotiating
the separation agreement. Even if an employer agrees to provide a
release of claims to the employee there should be appropriate
carve-outs, for example, the term should not operate to exempt or
indemnify a director against any liability to the company which
would otherwise attach to them in respect of any negligence,
default, breach of duty or breach of trust in relation to the
company (see section 468(2) and (3) of the Companies Ordinance)
unless it is a “permitted indemnity provision” (as
described in section 469 of the Companies
Ordinance)1.
- Incorporate appropriate
representations: Even where there has been an issue
leading up to the separation agreement and the employer has carried
out an investigation in respect of an employee, there may still be
issues (or claims against the employee) in respect of which the
employer is unaware. So, where the employer is considering
providing a release of claims against the employee, it should
accompany that release with the appropriate express representations
to be made by the employee upon which the employer relies to enter
into the agreement. The employee should be representing that the
employee has fully complied with the employment contract and there
are no circumstances which would give rise to any claims by the
employer against the employee.An employee who is reluctant to
provide this representation should be asked why they cannot do
so.
- Confidentiality and
non-disparagement provisions: Consider the appropriate
scope of confidentiality and non-disparagement obligations.
It is not uncommon for employers to require an employee who is receiving an ex-gratia payment to abide by confidentiality and (sometimes) non-disparagement obligations. This is despite the practical difficulties associated with enforcement. It may be difficult to detect and prove breach, and any enforcement action taken will likely disclose, if not highlight, the very confidential information the employer is looking to protect.
Sometimes the employee may insist on making confidentiality obligations mutual. An employer should carefully consider whether it should agree to the obligations and what their scope should be.
There may be circumstances where the employer wants to be able to respond publicly to protect its reputation, especially when it was the employee who breached the confidentiality obligation in the first place. The employer may find that it risks breaching the separation agreement which has the knock-on implication of potentially affecting its ability to rely on other clauses under the agreement, such as the release given by the employee.
If the employer wants to agree to mutual confidentiality obligations, it should make sure appropriate carve-outs are included. These may include, for example, reserving the ability to disclose information in a reactive manner to protect its interests should the need arise (e.g., rebutting false accusations made by the employee or any third party) or to disclose as required by law or to a regulator if it is in a regulated business. - Malus and clawback:
if the amount of the payout under the proposed separation agreement
is substantial and there are continuing obligations the employer
wants the employee to abide by, consider staggering the payment
over a period of time and including appropriate "malus"
and/or clawback clauses.
In essence, a malus clause allows the employer to stop making payments if certain circumstances arise (e.g., if the employee breaches a term of the separation agreement). A clawback clause, as the name suggests, is a clause providing the employer the right to clawback payments already made in the event the employee subsequently breaches a term of the separation agreement. While there will still be practical issues associated with enforcing these types of clauses, having them expressly stated in the separation agreement can have a deterrent effect as well as help demonstrate the contractual intent if action needs to be taken on enforcement. - Arbitration clause:
Consider using arbitration to resolve disputes, especially when the
issues are sensitive, the amounts are substantial and/or you do not
want issues aired in the public arena.
Arbitration has the advantage of having the dispute resolved in a confidential manner under the arbitral proceedings. The “dirty laundry” can then be kept away from the eyes of the public.
The above list is not exhaustive. There is no “one size fits all” solution. Each case should be considered based on its circumstances.
Footnotes
1 Note that the restriction on companies giving an indemnity provided under section 468 of the Companies Ordinance apply only to Hong Kong incorporated companies.
Originally published by Mayer Brown, August 2020
Visit us at www.mayerbrown.com
Mayer Brown is a global legal services organization comprising legal practices that are separate entities (the Mayer Brown Practices). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP, a limited liability partnership established in the United States; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales; Mayer Brown JSM, a Hong Kong partnership, and its associated entities in Asia; and Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of the Mayer Brown Practices in their respective jurisdictions.
© Copyright 2020. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.
This article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein. Please also read the JSM legal publications Disclaimer.