China: Trials & Appeals & Compensation

在走私犯罪辩护实务中,涉及军品出口的案件极为罕见且缺乏公开裁判规则。本文通过一起涉案金额逾百万美元的军品走私案例,展示了如何在...

A Chinese patent infringement case examines whether damages for continuing infringement during prior litigation proceedings should be included in subsequent lawsuits. The Supreme People's Court clarifies the principles for determining damages calculation periods when a patentee files multiple lawsuits against the same infringer, addressing the scope of prior judgments and the treatment of ongoing infringing acts discovered during litigation.

The Supreme People's Court has issued landmark rulings in two patent infringement cases that establish a crucial legal standard for preliminary injunctions issued alongside first-instance judgments. These decisions clarify when and how courts should maintain injunctive relief during the reconsideration stage, particularly when substantive hearings have already established infringement.

China's Supreme People's Court has issued a comprehensive 2026 Interpretation that fundamentally reshapes the punitive damages landscape for intellectual property disputes. The new framework introduces stricter procedural requirements, clearer standards for proving intentional infringement, and detailed methodologies for calculating damages multipliers. How will these refined rules impact litigation strategy and enforcement outcomes for rights holders operating in China's evolving IP regime?

China's Supreme People's Court has released seven guiding cases that establish new precedents for intellectual property protection, addressing critical issues from trade secret theft through employee poaching to malicious patent litigation. These landmark rulings introduce detailed enforcement mechanisms, clarify liability standards for online seed sales platforms, and strengthen remedies for copyright holders facing evidence obstruction.

China's Supreme People's Court has issued a landmark ruling in a semiconductor patent dispute between Chengdu Xinyuan System and Meraki Integrated Circuit, reversing a lower court's infringement finding.

摘要：保险公司被中国监管机关禁止出具担保性质的保函。但是保证保险单有效。无论保险公司出具保险单还是独立保函，判断的关键依据其文本

随着人工智能在法律领域的深度应用，当事人与律师使用人工智能工具的边界问题日益凸显。就当事人层面而言，本文以美国United States v. Heppner案为切入点，

当发现自己的专利可能被侵权了，不必慌张。在中国，专利维权是一个可以通过多途径、分多个步骤进行的过程。本文将对专利维权所需的工作和