Litigation Law, Mediation Law and Arbitration Law

Subscribe
Litigation law, mediation law, and arbitrage law thought leadership, articles, podcasts, videos and webinars from expert sources across the legal world. Explore insights covering civil law, class actions, dispute resolution, libel and defamation and more in relation to litigation, mediation and arbitration.
Article
When Are Pleadings Closed In Queensland?
Queensland's Uniform Civil Procedure Rules establish specific triggers for when pleadings close in civil proceedings, with significant implications for disclosure obligations and the scope of evidence parties may present. Understanding whether closure occurs 14 days after defence service or immediately upon reply service determines critical procedural deadlines and shapes the strategic decisions parties must make about responding to new allegations raised in opposing pleadings.
Australia Litigation
SL
Stonegate Legal
Article
No Reasons Required: Supreme Court Reinforces The Limits Of Medical Panel Judicial Review
The Victorian Supreme Court has ruled on the procedural framework governing Medical Panel referrals under the Wrongs Act, addressing whether multiple respondents can separately refer identical medical questions to different panels and whether subsequent panels must reconcile their findings with earlier determinations. The decision in Baressi v Cross Yarra Partnerships & Ors clarifies the independence of Medical Panel assessments and the limited grounds available for judicial review of their determinations.
Australia Litigation
K
Kennedys
See more

Webinars

See More

Related Country Guides

EF
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments
IA
International Arbitration
CA
Class Actions

Libel & Defamation

Article
Defamation Pleadings In Queensland
Defamation pleadings in Queensland require precise identification of the publication, the defamatory meaning conveyed, the audience, and the serious reputational harm alleged. The defence must respond directly to each element and plead substantive answers—such as truth or privilege—with supporting facts. Imprecise pleadings can trigger requests for particulars, amendment applications, or early strike-out motions under the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules and Defamation Act 2005 (Qld).
Australia Litigation
SL
Stonegate Legal
Article
Defamatory Meaning And The Ordinary Reasonable Person Test
What does it mean for a statement to be defamatory under Queensland law, and how do courts determine whether ordinary reasonable people would interpret a publication as damaging to someone's reputation? This analysis examines the legal test for defamatory meaning, the distinction between reasonable and strained implications, and the additional requirements plaintiffs must satisfy before commencing defamation proceedings.
Australia Litigation
SL
Stonegate Legal
See more

Class Actions

Article
When Is A Strip Search Legal In NSW?
Music festivals are high-energy and chaotic events with thousands of people in attendance – often involving alcohol and illicit drugs. For years, many young people in New South Wales were taken into tents and portable cubicles at music festivals for strip searches, told to remove their clothing, and made to squat, bend or lift body parts while police looked on. This process is obviously extremely demeaning, and forces people into extremely uncomfortable positions at the demand of authorities.
Australia Criminal
CD
Criminal Defence Lawyers Australia
See more

Court Procedure

Article
When Are Pleadings Closed In Queensland?
Queensland's Uniform Civil Procedure Rules establish specific triggers for when pleadings close in civil proceedings, with significant implications for disclosure obligations and the scope of evidence parties may present. Understanding whether closure occurs 14 days after defence service or immediately upon reply service determines critical procedural deadlines and shapes the strategic decisions parties must make about responding to new allegations raised in opposing pleadings.
Australia Litigation
SL
Stonegate Legal
Article
No Reasons Required: Supreme Court Reinforces The Limits Of Medical Panel Judicial Review
The Victorian Supreme Court has ruled on the procedural framework governing Medical Panel referrals under the Wrongs Act, addressing whether multiple respondents can separately refer identical medical questions to different panels and whether subsequent panels must reconcile their findings with earlier determinations. The decision in Baressi v Cross Yarra Partnerships & Ors clarifies the independence of Medical Panel assessments and the limited grounds available for judicial review of their determinations.
Australia Litigation
K
Kennedys
See more

Sovereign Immunity: Public Sector Government

Article
Flexible Work Requests – Lessons For The APS
Recent Australian Public Service census data reveals a growing trend in flexible work arrangements, supported by new enterprise agreement provisions. Two landmark Fair Work Commission decisions in Naden and Westpac now provide critical guidance on how employers must handle flexible work requests, highlighting the mandatory requirements and potential consequences of non-compliance that could result in orders granting employee requests even when business grounds exist for refusal.
Australia Employment
HR
Holding Redlich
See more

Latest Videos

See more