ARTICLE
9 June 2026

H-1B Visa Update: Federal Court Strikes Down $100,000 H-1B Visa Fee As Unauthorized Tax

Aa
Adams and Reese

Contributor

At Adams & Reese, we take things personally. Our people are connected – to each other, to our clients, our families, and our communities. Our industry-focused practice groups of attorneys and advisors are strategically organized throughout the southern U.S. and Washington, DC.

Adams & Reese professionals are known as practical and personal advisors and advocates who tailor their approach and counsel to the specific needs of each situation and client. Many on our team have years of on-the-job experience within the industries that we serve as executives, professionals, and in-house counsel. Taking a hands-on, personal approach to every issue, challenge and opportunity our clients face, Adams & Reese lawyers and advisors are skilled and ready to help clients achieve their goals and make their lives easier.

In a major development following our previous coverage of President Trump’s Proclamation regarding the new H-1B $100,000 fee, a federal judge has completely vacated the policy.
United States Immigration
Adams and Reese are most popular:
  • within Tax, Technology and Real Estate and Construction topic(s)
  • with readers working within the Aerospace & Defence and Technology industries

In a major development following our previous coverage of President Trump’s Proclamation regarding the new H-1B $100,000 fee, a federal judge has completely vacated the policy. On June 8, 2026, U.S. District Judge Leo T. Sorokin of the District of Massachusetts struck down the $100,000 H-1B payment requirement, declaring it unlawful.

The court ruled that the $100,000 payment requirement constituted an unauthorized tax, rather than a penalty or a simple regulatory fee. While the government argued that the President had broad authority to restrict the entry of noncitizens under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), Judge Sorokin held that the INA does not delegate Congress’s exclusive constitutional power to lay and collect taxes to the executive branch.

Furthermore, the court found that the government’s swift implementation of the fee via Presidential Proclamation violated the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). The agencies failed to comply with mandatory notice-and-comment rulemaking procedures, exceeded their statutory fee-setting authority, and acted arbitrarily and capriciously by not considering employers’ reliance interests or offering a reasoned explanation for the massive new financial burden.

What This Means Going Forward

Because the court vacated the policy implementing the $100,000 payment requirement in its entirety, the complex web of payment instructions and exemptions we previously analyzed is now moot. Employers sponsoring foreign talent are no longer required to pay this $100,000 exaction when filing new H-1B petitions. If your case was subjected to the fee either through consular processing or a Request for Evidence, reach out to immigration counsel for next steps. We will continue to monitor the docket for any potential appeals by the government.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More