ARTICLE
5 March 2025

Newly Filed Legislation Positions Texas As A Leading State For Incorporations

FL
Foley & Lardner

Contributor

Foley & Lardner LLP looks beyond the law to focus on the constantly evolving demands facing our clients and their industries. With over 1,100 lawyers in 24 offices across the United States, Mexico, Europe and Asia, Foley approaches client service by first understanding our clients’ priorities, objectives and challenges. We work hard to understand our clients’ issues and forge long-term relationships with them to help achieve successful outcomes and solve their legal issues through practical business advice and cutting-edge legal insight. Our clients view us as trusted business advisors because we understand that great legal service is only valuable if it is relevant, practical and beneficial to their businesses.
On February 27, 2025, Senate Bill No. 29 was filed in the Texas Legislature to introduce a series of corporate reforms that aim to make Texas the preferred jurisdiction for legal domestication.
United States Corporate/Commercial Law

On February 27, 2025, Senate Bill No. 29 was filed in the Texas Legislature to introduce a series of corporate reforms that aim to make Texas the preferred jurisdiction for legal domestication. This bill proposes a series of amendments to the Texas Business Organizations Code that would increase the certainty for how corporate decision-making is reviewed by the courts.

A companion, House Bill 15, has also been filed.

Key Provisions of S.B. 29

1. Fundamental Reforms

The two most significant amendments effected by S.B. 29 are the codification of the so-called "business judgment rule" and the permission for Texas corporations to adopt an ownership threshold that must be met for derivative claims.

  • Codifying the Business Judgment Rule: The business judgment rule is a common law concept in effect in most states providing that directors are not held personally liable for decisions made in good faith and with reasonable care, provided the decisions were made in the best interests of the company. S.B. 29 codifies the business judgment rule and reforms it so that a plaintiff bears the burden to prove any claim for breach of fiduciary duty. This limits the ability of artful pleading to undo the protections of the common law rule and offers shareholders and their elected directors greater certainty in making and executing business decisions. [Bill Section 10; proposed new Business Organizations Code Section 21.419]
  • Protecting Business Decisions from Opportunistic Legal Claims: The bill proposes reforms to shield businesses from meritless, distracting lawsuits. Key provisions include:
    • Requiring a minimum ownership percentage before a shareholder can pursue a derivative lawsuit. [Bill Section 11; proposed amendment to Business Organizations Code Section 21.551(2)]
    • Prohibiting the recovery of attorney's fees in cases where a derivative lawsuit results in a "disclosure-only" settlement (which often resolves without substantive changes). [Bill Section 14; proposed amendment to Business Organizations Code Section 21.561]
    • Allowing companies to seek an upfront determination from a judge regarding the independence of directors serving on special committees before those directors are called into question as part of a derivative claim. [Bill Sections 7 and 8; proposed amendment to Business Organizations Code Section 21.416 (reviewing transactions), and new Section 21.4161 (special litigation committees)

2. Additional Provisions

In addition to the provisions described above, S.B. 29 contains the following:

  1. Exclusive Venue for Internal Disputes: Companies will be able to specify in their governing documents that the Texas Business Court or another particular court in Texas will serve as the exclusive venue for resolving internal disputes. [Bill Section 3; proposed amendment to Business Organizations Code Section 2.115(b)].
  2. Waiver of Jury Trials for Internal Disputes: Corporations will be able to join LLCs and LPs in including a waiver of jury trial in their governing documents for internal disputes. [Bill Section 4; proposed new Business Organizations Code Section 2.116].
  3. Clarification of Texas Business Law: S.B. 29 provides that the Texas Business Organizations Code is not subject to the interpretation of laws or judicial decisions from other states. [Bill Section 2; proposed new Business Organizations Code Section 1.056].
  4. Keeping Filing Date for Corrected Filing: S.B. 29 provides that a company can correct a filing rejected by the Secretary of State and still keep the initial date of filing. [Bill Section 5; proposed amendment Business Organizations Code Section 4.051]
  5. Restricting books and records requests. The bill provides that emails and similar communications are not generally corporate books and records and that books and records requests cannot be used to replace discovery in certain actions. [Bill Section 6; proposed amendment to Business Organizations Code Section 21.218]

What Does This Mean for Public Companies?

S.B. 29 contains significant changes to Texas law that could materially affect the governance of and litigation risk to companies, especially public companies, incorporated in Texas. By strengthening the legal protections for business leaders, ensuring the expeditious resolution of corporate disputes, and offering more control over corporate litigation, the bill, if passed, would make Texas an increasingly attractive option for companies looking to relocate or incorporate.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More