ARTICLE
28 August 2026

Merchant Banking Investments: Balancing Portfolio Oversight With Operating Restrictions

DM
Duane Morris LLP

Contributor

Duane Morris LLP, a law firm with more than 900 attorneys in offices across the United States and internationally, is asked by a broad array of clients to provide innovative solutions to today's legal and business challenges.
Merchant banking authority under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act grants Financial Holding Companies powerful investment capabilities, but creates a fundamental tension between non-interference requirements and the need for investment oversight. The Federal Reserve permits certain protective covenants that align with standard corporate governance practices, while strict holding periods of 10-15 years apply with complex timing rules for affiliated transfers.
United States Finance and Banking
Joseph E. Silvia’s articles from Duane Morris LLP are most popular:
  • with readers working within the Business & Consumer Services and Retail & Leisure industries
Duane Morris LLP are most popular:
  • within Law Department Performance topic(s)

Merchant banking authority granted under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act gives Financial Holding Companies (“FHCs”) – superstar Bank Holding Companies that elect to become FHCs – powerful investment capabilities, but it comes with a fundamental tension. Under 12 CFR 225.171, an FHC may not “routinely manage or operate” a portfolio company held under merchant banking authority. Yet, as any experienced investor knows, some level of oversight is essential to protect the investment.

Permissible Covenants and Restrictions

The Federal Reserve recognizes this tension and permits certain protective covenants. Covenants restricting the portfolio company from engaging in activities outside the ordinary course of business are generally permissible. The standard is contextual: the significance of any restriction depends on the nature of the restriction and the size, capital condition, business type, and characteristics of the portfolio company.

As a general rule, actions that would normally require board-of-directors approval would also be permissible subjects for FHC covenant protections. This aligns FHC oversight authority with standard corporate governance practices.

Holding Period Rules

Merchant banking investments are subject to strict holding periods: generally 10 years, or 15 years for qualifying private equity fund investments.

Several timing rules apply:

  • If the FHC acquired the investment before becoming a BHC/FHC, the holding period starts on the date it became an FHC.
  • When an FHC acquires from another (unaffiliated) FHC, the holding period generally starts at the date of acquisition.
  • When acquired from an affiliate, the “tacking” rule under 12 CFR 225.172(b)(2)-(3) applies — the original acquisition date carries over.

Failure to divest within the applicable holding period can result in enforcement action or other regulatory challenges. Accurate tracking of acquisition dates, especially through affiliated-party transfers, is therefore essential.

DM Tip: FHCs should maintain detailed timelines and documentation for each merchant banking investment, including acquisition dates and any affiliated-party transfers, to accurately track holding periods and avoid regulatory violations. Contact us for a review of your merchant banking investments, timelines, and documentation.

Disclaimer: This Alert has been prepared and published for informational purposes only and is not offered, nor should be construed, as legal advice. For more information, please see the firm's full disclaimer.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More