ARTICLE
22 July 2026

EEOC Votes On Proposed Rule To End EEO-1 Reporting

WT
Weintraub Tobin Chediak Coleman Grodin Law Corporation

Contributor

Weintraub Tobin is an innovative provider of sophisticated legal services to dynamic businesses and business owners, individuals, emerging companies, and nonprofits. From locations in Los Angeles, Newport Beach, Sacramento, San Diego, and San Francisco, Weintraub attorneys assist clients throughout California and nationwide with their business and litigation needs.

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has voted to propose ending the decades-long requirement for employers to file annual demographic data reports on employee race and sex. The proposed rule change would eliminate EEO-1 Reports and similar filings, which the EEOC now considers inconsistent with equal employment opportunity law and potentially raising constitutional concerns.
United States Employment and HR
Lizbeth (Beth) V. West’s articles from Weintraub Tobin Chediak Coleman Grodin Law Corporation are most popular:
  • within Employment and HR topic(s)
  • with Senior Company Executives and HR
  • in Canada
  • with readers working within the Technology and Property industries

As we indicated in our June 4, 2026 article, certain employers may soon be relieved of the obligation to file EEO-1 Reports, as well as other reports (“EEO Data Reports”), with the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”). On July 21, 2026, the EEOC voted 2-1 to issue a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) to end the long-required demographic data collection and reporting by covered employers. Currently covered employers are required to file annual reports with the EEOC summarizing aggregate data on their employees’ race and sex to assist in evaluating potential discriminatory practices under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. 

The EEOC’s NPRM is a 63-page proposal published in the Federal Register. In the NPRM, the EEOC determined that the EEO Data Reports are inconsistent with equal employment opportunity law, may raise constitutional concerns, and collect data that is not narrowly tailored or necessary to enforce anti-discrimination statutes. According to the EEOC, under Title VII, the agency is not required to impose these reporting obligations and may eliminate them when they are inconsistent with the law, not useful, or counter to enforcement priorities. The NPRM concludes that any limited value of the reports is outweighed by the significant burdens they impose on employers and on the EEOC — particularly because employers must submit them annually without any specific indication of a potential violation. 

The NPRM will undergo a 30-day public comment period, after which the EEOC will review any feedback before voting on a final decision. 

The EEOC’s press release, with a hyperlink to the NPRM, can be found here:

https://www.eeoc.gov/newsroom/eeoc-proposes-rescission-annual-race-and-sex-reporting-requirements

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More