ARTICLE
3 July 2026

CCI Dismisses Abuse Of Dominance Allegations Against Railway Components Manufacturer

AP
AZB & Partners

Contributor

AZB & Partners is one of India's premier law firms with 500+ lawyers and offices across the country. The firm was founded in 2004 with a clear purpose to provide reliable, practical and full–service advice to clients, across all sectors. Having grown steadily since its inception, AZB & Partners now has offices across Mumbai, Delhi, Bangalore, Pune and Chennai. We are recognized by most international publications for our legal expertise.
This website disclaimer outlines the terms under which users may access information about AZB & Partners law firm. The notice addresses Bar Council of India regulations prohibiting solicitation and advertising, while establishing that user access is voluntary and does not create an attorney-client relationship.
India Corporate/Commercial Law
AZB & Partners are most popular:
  • within Strategy, Environment and International Law topic(s)
  • with readers working within the Accounting & Consultancy industries

In an Order passed at the threshold stage, the CCI dismissed a case of abuse of dominant position against the Short Neutral Section Assemblies (‘SNSA’) manufacturer, Arthur Flury.

SNSA are critical safety components used in railway traction systems. The complainant had alleged that, due to Government-imposed restrictions on the public procurement of SNSA from global (non-Indian) manufacturers, Arthur Flury was the only manufacturer and supplier of SNSA in India that was eligible to bid in tenders for the Indian Railways in 2023-24. The CCI agreed with the complainant’s submissions on market delineation and dominance, but dismissed allegations of exploitative and discriminatory prices. The CCI was persuaded that there were objective reasons which explained Arthur Flury’s pricing (including external factors such as inflation, quantity of the order, currency fluctuations, etc.).

The CCI also recognised that Arthur Flury’s position as the sole eligible supplier was not the result of its own conduct, but a by-product of the regulatory framework set by state authorities. Within a period of two years, a new eligible manufacturer entered the market, and Arthur Flury’s prices in response to the increase in competition fell.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More