Introduction
In June 2025, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) implemented a landmark wave of statutory changes under the Companies Act, 2013. These reforms reflect the culmination of a decade-long evolution from form-based compliance to a regime built around rich data and greater transparency. The transition symbolizes India's shift to technology-driven corporate regulation, with a clear push towards accountability, traceability, and robust stakeholder trust. The major amendments can be summarized as follows–
- 1Companies (Cost Records and Audit) Amendment Rules, 2025
- The amendments include substitution of Forms CRA-2 and CRA-4 for cost auditor appointment intimation and filing of cost audit reports effective from July 14, 2025.
- The amended Forms include enhanced data fields for appointment nature, industries covered, audit scope, reports, and declarations.
- 2Companies (Management & Administration) Rules, 2014
The amendments include substitution of core annual compliance forms with new dynamic e-forms like, MGT-7, MGT-7A (for small/OPCs), and MGT-15 (for AGM reports by listed companies). These forms now require extensive disclosures than before such as:
- Geolocation of registered office (latitude, longitude)
- Mandatory photograph of registered offices displaying the company nameplate
- Expanded shareholder disclosures (pattern, FII/FPI holdings, ESOPs, buybacks)
- Detailed records of board and committee meetings, and presence tracking.
The amendment is aimed at increased visibility of company activities, to deter shell/benami operations and improve the uniformity across filings.
- 3 Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014
Rule 13(2) was amended to mandate that reports relating to auditor frauds must be filed as e-forms (ADT-4). Furthermore, the entire suite of auditor-related forms such as ADT-1 (appointment), ADT-2 (removal), ADT-3 (resignation), and ADT-4 (fraud report) have been replaced with new requirements such as:
- Thorough details of auditor eligibility (e.g., PAN, registration, category), traceable history, and supporting attachments such as resignation letters, appointment orders, board/Audit Committee minutes.
- Mandatory referencing of previous filings (SRNs).
- Enhanced fields to ensure complete traceability through a statutory audit cycle and facilitate closer regulatory scrutiny (Forms ADT-1–ADT-4).
The amendment is aimed at improved vigilance on auditor transitions and setting a higher bar for fraud detection and reporting.
- 4 Companies (Registration Offices and Fees) Amendment Rules, 2025
A major amendment is seen in Form GNL-1, which now covers a broad array of requirements such as:
- Condonation of delay, AGM extension requests, compounding of offences, as well as schemes of amalgamation and other arrangements.
- Moreover, companies are required to give granular details of the nature, reason and duration of default, remedial actions, and attach all supporting documentary evidence.
This redesign brings stricter accountability for companies seeking regulatory relaxations and systematically logs historical compliance events.
- 5Companies (Cost Records and Audit) Rules, 2014
MCA replaced Form CRA-2 (intimation of cost auditor appointment) with an e-form with the following additional requirements:
- Companies must categorically state the type of filing (original, due to merger/demerger, vacancy, new product, etc.) and reference earlier related filings (SRNs).
- Detailed cost auditor information; membership/firm numbers, PAN, scope of audit, and jurisdiction must be disclosed along with signed board resolutions (Form No. CRA-2).
The amendment is aimed at eliminating ambiguities in auditor appointment, easier detection of conflict and abrupt shifts in cost audit professionals.
Overall Impact of the Amendments
Digitisation and Standardisation
The comprehensive replacement of static forms with e-forms is perhaps the most visible practical change. Companies are now required to embrace a data-driven compliance model, minimizing errors, omissions, or manipulated filings. Uniform digital formats also enable real-time verification and robust cross-referencing by regulators.
Expansion of Disclosure
The depth and breadth of disclosures have increased dramatically. For instance:
- Annual returns require geotagged evidence of physical presence.
- Auditor forms seek detailed causes for resignation/removal and insist on SRN traceability.
- Cost audit filings document corporate restructure, continuity, and succession with clear categorical choices.
This architecture greatly reduces regulatory blind spots, helping pre-empt shell company creation, address passive compliance, and provide transparent auditor transition records.
Auditor and Cost Auditor Oversight
With stricter requirements for fraud reporting (ADT-4) and the need for precise audit trail maintenance, the amendments are designed to restore/boost stakeholder faith following audit-related scandals of previous years. Every change in auditor, whether due to resignation, corporate action, or special appointment, must now be electronically justified with supporting evidence.
Transparent Default, Relief, and Regulatory Approvals
Revised GNL-1 makes it impossible for companies to casually seek extension of regulatory deadlines, condonation of lapses, or compounding of offences without disclosing granular context, documentary support, and a transparent account of corrective steps taken.
Conclusion
In light of the above, these modifications support a culture of accountability and openness from the perspective of governance. A wider range of data is now available to regulators, which can be examined for sectoral patterns, compliance trends, or warning signs. Since improved disclosure standards boosts the trust in the veracity of business filings, the investors and other stakeholders also are placed in a better position to anticipate gain indirectly. Although these may initially necessitate higher expenditure for businesses in compliance infrastructure, employee training, and internal procedures, in the long run, these modifications should result in lower conflicts, boost credibility, and bring Indian corporate governance norms in line with the international best practices.
MCA's explicit intention to transition from a formality-driven compliance regime to a substantive, information-centric regime is highlighted by these measures. The long-term result is anticipated to be a more strong, transparent, and accountable corporate sector that is better able to withstand regulatory and investor scrutiny, even though the immediate effect is an increased compliance burden on corporates and auditors.
Footnotes
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
