ARTICLE
27 August 2020

Protection Granted To Unreal Engine But Not Fortnite Following Altercation With Apple

WP
WH Partners

Contributor

We are a law firm with a strong focus on assisting businesses fuelling the digital economy and not only in the territories we operate in. We have offices in Malta, Italy, Romania, and we operate Czech, Polish and UAE desks, as well as having a worldwide network of correspondent firms. We have a well-established practice advising clients on (in no particular order) fintech, gaming & gambling, corporate, M&A, tax, dispute resolution, corporate finance, intellectual property, data privacy and personal data processing, consumer protection & advertising, real estate, employment & immigration matters, sports, technology & media, competition & state aid. Our firm and several of our lawyers are highly ranked by Chambers & Partners, Legal 500, IFLR1000 and Who’s Who Legal.
Apple has been granted permission to refrain from immediately reinstating Fortnite to its App Store.
Malta Media, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment

This is an update to a recent article that we published, which may be accessed here.

Apple has been granted permission to refrain from immediately reinstating Fortnite to its App Store. However, U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers decided to grant Epic's request, rendering Apple unable to terminate game developers accounts which use Unreal Engine. In a statement Judge Rogers held that Apple has acted "severely, hurting third-party developers" who choose to utilize Epic's technology. This decision was taken following a letter sent by Apple to Epic. This letter stated that if Epic refused to comply with the App Store rules, hence removing the direct payment options from Fortnite, all of Epic's developer accounts and access to Apple development tools would have be terminated this coming Friday, August 28. Such removal would have resulted in Unreal Engine not being supported on iOS.

This ruling comes to play as Apple faces serious backlash from numerous app developers who are claiming that the App Store fee of 30% is unjust. Judge Rogers further insisted that this ruling, which renders neither side completely victorious, does in no way dictate the final outcome of the pending litigation. Judge Rogers has set a September 28 hearing on Epic's request for a preliminary injunction.

In this regard, we will be providing updates on the progression of this case. Should you require any further information to the above or assistance about gaming-related matters, do not hesitate to contact us.

The information provided above is accurate as of the 26th August 2020.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More