ARTICLE
11 June 2025

The First Anti-Foreign Sanctions Case By China Company Pursuant To Article 12 Of AFSL

JT
Jincheng Tongda & Neal

Contributor

Founded in 1992 and headquartered in Beijing, Beijing Jincheng Tongda & Neal Law Firm is one of the first partnership law firms in China. So far, JT&M has successively carried out key layouts in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei, Yangtze River Delta, Greater Bay Area, Bohai Rim, Chengdu-Chongqing Economic Circle and other national economic development strategic regions, with offices in Beijing, Shanghai, Shenzhen, Hefei, Hangzhou, Nanjing, Guangzhou, Qingdao, Chengdu, Chongqing, Xi'an, Shenyang, Jinan, Dalian, Zhengzhou and other offices, as well as offices in Hong Kong, Tokyo, Japan, Singapore and other offices. Since 2000, it has been rated as "Ministerial-level Civilized Law Firm" and "National Excellent Law Firm" for many times; JT&D has gathered many interdisciplinary experts and has become a leader in the industry in many fields, and has won a number of awards from well-known legal rating agencies such as Chambers and ALB.

In 2024, the Nanjing Maritime Court heard a case in which a marine engineering company had filed a lawsuit against a foreign equipment company.
China Corporate/Commercial Law

In 2024, the Nanjing Maritime Court heard a case in which a marine engineering company had filed a lawsuit against a foreign equipment company. This case, later cited in the Supreme People's Court's Report during the Two Sessions, was the first to apply Article 12 of "the Anti-Foreign Sanctions Law of the People's Republic of China" ("AFSL").

In the middle of 2024, the foreign equipment company had refused to pay the outstanding US$11.86 million to the marine engineering company, and terminated negotiations after a third country imposed sanctions on the marine engineering company.

The marine engineering company applied to the Nanjing Maritime Court for pre-litigation attachment of the subject vessel, and claimed compensation under Article 12 of AFSL. To lift the attachment, the equipment company applied for a payment license from the jurisdiction which had imposed the relevant sanctions, and thereafter submitted a counter-guarantee of about RMB 99 million.

After the court elucidated the legal implications of foreign sanctions under Chinese law, the parties reached a mediation agreement within less than two months. Subsequently, the court issued a civil mediation document, and the settlement funds were transferred through enforcement procedures.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More