ARTICLE
30 October 2024

STF Confirms Environmental Compensation Within Same Biome

KL
KLA Advogados

Contributor

Founded on May 13th, 2002, in São Paulo, KLA has in its DNA the commitment to go beyond the services provided by traditional law firms and build long-term partnerships with its clients. KLA values a collaborative and development-oriented culture, investing in its professionals at every stage of their careers. The firm maintains a horizontal and barrier-free structure, where partners, lawyers, and interns sit side by side, engaged in a constant exchange of knowledge.
STF also allows continuation of sanitary landfills in Permanent Preservation Areas (APPs), provided licensing conditions are met
Brazil Environment
Flávia Marcilio’s articles from KLA Advogados are most popular:
  • with readers working within the Insurance industries
KLA Advogados are most popular:
  • within Cannabis & Hemp, Strategy, Food, Drugs, Healthcare and Life Sciences topic(s)

STF also allows continuation of sanitary landfills in Permanent Preservation Areas (APPs), provided licensing conditions are met

On Thursday (24), the Supreme Federal Court (STF) partially upheld the motions for clarification filed by the Office of the Attorney General (AGU) in the Direct Action of Unconstitutionality (ADI) 4901, concerning provisions of the Forestry Code, Law No. 12,651/2012.

On this occasion, the Court confirmed the constitutionality of Article 48, §2, of the aforementioned law, determining that environmental compensation for cases of Legal Reserve deficit must occur in areas within the same biome. In its initial ruling in 2018, the STF had referenced "ecological identity"; however, in this revised understanding, the Court adopted "biome" as the compensatory criterion, aligning with the Forestry Code's own provisions.

Additionally, the ruling allowed for the continuation of sanitary landfills already installed in Permanent Preservation Areas (APPs), or those in the process of installation, provided they operate within the pre-established timeframe and comply with environmental licensing regulations. It was also determined that, following the closure of these units, removing deposited material will not be required, as reforestation of the area remains a viable option.

In the 2018 ruling, the Court had previously found the continued presence of landfills in APPs unconstitutional, which would have led to significant social and economic impact from the shutdown of these operations.

Thus, sanitary landfills may remain in these areas. However, it is essential to emphasize the need to protect APPs, as new commercial projects must adhere to preservation requirements under Federal Law No. 12,651/2012.

It is noteworthy that ADI 4901 was joined with other actions—ADI 4902, 4903, 4937, and ADC 42—all examining the constitutionality of provisions within the Forestry Code.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More