ARTICLE
21 May 2025

Brazilian Ministry Of Labor And Employment Postpones Effective Date Of NR1 Amendments

MB
Mayer Brown

Contributor

Mayer Brown is a distinctively global law firm, uniquely positioned to advise the world’s leading companies and financial institutions on their most complex deals and disputes. We have deep experience in high-stakes litigation and complex transactions across industry sectors, including our signature strength, the global financial services industry.
On May 15, following the release of a recent legal update regarding the recent amendments to Regulatory Standard No. 1 (NR 1), the Ministry of Labor and Employment published Ordinance MTE No. 765/2025, which directly impacts the implementation schedule of the changes set forth for chapter 1.5 of NR 1.
Brazil Employment and HR

On May 15, following therelease of a recent legal update regarding the recent amendments to Regulatory Standard No. 1(NR 1), the Ministry of Labor and Employment published Ordinance MTE No. 765/2025, which directly impacts the implementation schedule of the changes set forth for chapter 1.5 of NR 1.

What changed with Ordinance MTE No. 765/2025?

Through the new ordinance, the Ministry of Labor and Employment has postponed the effective date of the new wording of Chapter 1.5 of NR 1, "Occupational Risk Management." As a result, the obligation to comply with the new rules, originally scheduled for May 26, 2025, is now slated to begin May 25, 2026.

Key Takeaways

  • Extension of the deadline: Under the new wording of Chapter 1.5, the effective date of NR 1 has been officially postponed to May 25, 2026. Until this date, the previous rules for occupational risk management remain in force.
  • How to best use this additional period: The recommendation highlighted in ourMay 8 Legal Updateon this topic remains valid. Companies should use this additional period to review and improve their internal Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) processes, especially with regard to the mapping and management of occupational risks, including psychological and social risks.
  • Opportunity for adaptation: This delay represents a strategic opportunity for companies to prepare more robustly for the future obligations, promoting integration among the OHS and their corporate administration.

Recommendations for companies

Companies should take advantage of the official delay of the effective date of the amendments to review and enhance their OHS processes, ensuring that all occupational risks—physical, chemical, biological, ergonomic, and especially psycho-social—are rigorously mapped and managed by qualified professionals. Effective integration among the OHS, human resources, legal, and the company's administration is essential to promote a safer, healthier work environment aligned with legal requirements.

It is equally essential for companies to remain up to date with regulatory changes and guidelines issued by the Ministry of Labor and Employment, to ensure ongoing compliance with applicable legislation and mitigate the risk of potential labor liabilities.

Visit us at mayerbrown.com

Mayer Brown is a global services provider comprising associated legal practices that are separate entities, including Mayer Brown LLP (Illinois, USA), Mayer Brown International LLP (England & Wales), Mayer Brown (a Hong Kong partnership) and Tauil & Chequer Advogados (a Brazilian law partnership) and non-legal service providers, which provide consultancy services (collectively, the "Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are established in various jurisdictions and may be a legal person or a partnership. PK Wong & Nair LLC ("PKWN") is the constituent Singapore law practice of our licensed joint law venture in Singapore, Mayer Brown PK Wong & Nair Pte. Ltd. Details of the individual Mayer Brown Practices and PKWN can be found in the Legal Notices section of our website. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of Mayer Brown.

© Copyright 2025. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.

This Mayer Brown article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More