ARTICLE
17 March 2003

Health Plans Must Comply with HIPAA’s Privacy Rule by April 14, 2003

MM
Montgomery McCracken Walker & Rhoads LLP

Contributor

At Montgomery McCracken, our collaborative approach connects clients with the right resources at the right time, fostering efficiency and delivering the outcomes our clients expect. We fully engage with client goals, providing strategic advice that supports informed decision-making and enables swift, decisive action, treating each client’s challenges as our own. Our clients include public and private companies, nonprofits, educational and governmental entities, and individuals across industries, whom we represent in complex litigation, intellectual property, bankruptcy, corporate law, and regulatory matters. With a strong presence in Pennsylvania, New York, New Jersey, and Delaware, we litigate across the U.S. and internationally. Founded over a century ago by esteemed Philadelphia lawyers, including U.S. Supreme Court Justice Owen J. Roberts, our legacy of excellence guides us as we continue to offer responsive, agile, and cost-effective legal solutions for our clients’ evolving needs.

United States Strategy

Group health plans with 50 or more participants are "covered entities" under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 ("HIPAA"). As such, they are required to comply with HIPAA’s privacy rule. Most group health plans must be in compliance by April 14, 2003; however, the deadline for group health plans with annual receipts of $5 million or less is April 14, 2004.

The general purpose of the privacy rule is to secure individuals’ protected health information ("PHI") and ensure that it is made available only for purposes of treatment, payment, and health care operations. The driving concern is that an employer might learn of an employee’s medical condition and take adverse action against the employee on the basis of that information.

The privacy rule requires different degrees of compliance depending on whether the group health plan is self-insured and to what extent the employer/ health plan sponsor uses or discloses PHI. For example, in the case of an employer that needs PHI to administer its group health plan, the plan document and summary plan description will need to be revised, policies and procedures for handling PHI will need to be implemented, and contracts with business associates will need to be signed — among other things. For an employer that does not require PHI or for a fully insured group health plan, the administrative burdens are substantially lessened.

For assistance in implementing the HIPAA privacy rule, please contact one of the attorneys in Montgomery, McCracken’s Employee Benefits, Executive Compensation, and Immigration Services Section.

The content of this article does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on in that way. Specific advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More