ARTICLE
26 April 2019

Challenges For Canadian L-1 Applicants Presenting Renewal Petitions At The Border

KL
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP

Contributor

Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer is a world-leading global law firm, where our ambition is to help you achieve your goals. Exceptional client service and the pursuit of excellence are at our core. We invest in and care about our client relationships, which is why so many are longstanding. We enjoy breaking new ground, as we have for over 170 years. As a fully integrated transatlantic and transpacific firm, we are where you need us to be. Our footprint is extensive and committed across the world’s largest markets, key financial centres and major growth hubs. At our best tackling complexity and navigating change, we work alongside you on demanding litigation, exacting regulatory work and complex public and private market transactions. We are recognised as leading in these areas. We are immersed in the sectors and challenges that impact you. We are recognised as standing apart in energy, infrastructure and resources. And we’re focused on areas of growth that affect every business across the world.
U.S. Customs and Border Protection is suddenly, and without advance notice, refusing to adjudicate and process L-1 petition renewals submitted by Canadian nationals at ports-of-entry and at Canadian international airports, ...
United States Immigration

U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) is suddenly, and without advance notice, refusing to adjudicate and process L-1 petition renewals submitted by Canadian nationals at ports-of-entry (POEs) and at Canadian international airports, a benefit that Canadian nationals have enjoyed for decades. Filing at the port of entry was quicker than filing an extension with U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), and generally led to a less stringent adjudication. 

CBP now appears to be taking the view that a request for a subsequent L-1 visa petition amounts to a request for an "extension," which, according to immigration regulations, falls under the exclusive jurisdiction of USCIS. This viewpoint distorts the benefit that is actually being sought by the Canadian L-1 applicants, as a renewal of one's L-1 petition ― which is what applicants are seeking ― is distinct from a request to extend one's period of authorized stay in the U.S. (which is under the exclusive purview of USCIS). There does not seem to be a legal basis for CBP refusing to process these petitions at POEs. Nevertheless, unless and until CBP is convinced of the error of its ways, Canadian national employees currently in the U.S. in L-1 status will be forced to file extensions of stays through USCIS (which under the Trump administration has been much tougher on L extensions than has CBP), rather than seeking to process at the border.

We will continue to monitor this fluid situation and provide updated information as it becomes available.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More