ARTICLE
31 March 2020

Show Me The Money: Only Quantitative Investment Data Can Satisfy The Domestic Industry Requirement

JD
Jones Day

Contributor

Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,500 lawyers across five continents. The Firm is distinguished by a singular tradition of client service; the mutual commitment to, and the seamless collaboration of, a true partnership; formidable legal talent across multiple disciplines and jurisdictions; and shared professional values that focus on client needs.
In a recently issued Commission Opinion, the ITC affirmed ALJ Bullock's application of the Federal Circuit's rule that a quantitative analysis must be performed in order to determine whether
United States Finance and Banking

Visit the Jones Day ITC Blog.

In a recently issued Commission Opinion, the ITC affirmed ALJ Bullock's application of the Federal Circuit's rule that a quantitative analysis must be performed in order to determine whether a complainant has satisfied the economic prong of the domestic industry requirement under Section 337(a)(3).    In the Matter of Certain Carburetors and Products Containing Such Carburetors, Inv. No. 337-TA-1123, Comm'n Op. (Oct. 28, 2019) (citing Order 77 (Aug. 12, 2019).  We have previously reported on different ways  that complainants can satisfy the domestic industry standard, and how declining domestic investments may still qualify as significant.

Read the full article at jonesdayitcblog.com.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More