ARTICLE
28 September 2026

President Trump Announces U.S. Counter-tariffs On Canada: Are They Lawful?

MA
MLT Aikins LLP

Contributor

MLT Aikins LLP is a full-service law firm of more than 375 lawyers with a deep commitment to Western Canada and an understanding of this market’s unique legal and business landscapes.
President Trump has invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930 to impose new counter-tariffs on Canadian goods including dairy, alcohol, motorcycles, and metal products. The legality of this rarely-used statutory provision remains untested in court, raising questions about presidential tariff authority under the U.S. Constitution. Legal scholars debate whether Section 338 has been superseded by later trade legislation, while the administration argues Canada's retaliatory measures constitute discriminator
Global International Law

On September 8, 2026, President Trump announced new counter-tariffs on Canada in response to Canada’s late August counter-tariffs on the United States.

Latest U.S. counter-tariffs target dairy, motorcycles and alcohol

The U.S. counter-tariffs ban certain Canadian products from entering the U.S. and modify the tariffs on Canadian goods previously announced on July 20, 2026. The newest counter-tariffs include:

  • Banning certain alcoholic beverage imports including beer, wine and spirits
  • Imposing 50% tariffs on certain dairy products, primarily cheese
  • Banning certain whey product imports
  • Banning motorcycle imports
  • Imposing 50% tariffs on certain paper and metal products, including specified aluminum, iron and steel goods

The import bans take effect on September 29, 2026, while the changes to previously announced tariffs take effect on September 15, 2026.

Presidential tariff powers

Article I of the U.S. Constitution grants Congress the exclusive authority to impose tariffs on foreign nations. However, Congress has enacted several statutes that delegate tariff authority to the president in specific circumstances.

Six statutory provisions may authorize the president to issue tariffs:

  • Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962
  • Section 201 of the Trade Act of 1974
  • Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974
  • The International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977 (IEEPA);
  • Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974
  • Section 338 of Tariff Act of 1930

The first three provisions require an investigation before tariffs may be imposed, while the latter three permit the president to act without a prior investigation.

Last year, President Trump imposed tariffs under IEPPA following the declaration of a national emergency relating to illicit drugs. In early 2026, however, the U.S. Supreme Court held that IEPPA does not authorize the president to impose tariffs.

Following that decision, President Trump imposed a 10% tariff on foreign goods under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, becoming the first president to invoke that provision. Section 122 authorizes temporary tariffs to address international payment issues, including balance of payments deficits. More than two dozen states have since filed a lawsuit challenging the legality of the Section 122 tariffs.

Most recently, President Trump has relied on Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930 to impose tariffs targeting Canada. Section 338 authorizes the president to impose tariffs on countries that engage in unfair or discriminatory trade practices against the United States. Enacted during the Great Depression, Section 338 had never been used before President Trump invoked it earlier this year. In announcing the latest round of counter-tariffs, President Trump cited Canada’s recent retaliatory tariffs on U.S. steel, dairy and agricultural equipment as discriminatory.

Legality of Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930

Whether the latest round of counter-tariffs will withstand judicial scrutiny remains an open question. As noted above, the U.S. Constitution grants Congress the exclusive authority to impose tariffs, and the president may only do so where Congress has delegated that power. Some legal scholars argue that Section 338 has been superseded by later legislation, including the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 and the Trade Act of 1974.

At the same time, because the latest round of counter-tariffs come in response to Canada’s counter-tariffs which took effect in September 2026, there is an argument that Canada engaged in discriminatory trade practices against the United States. If accepted, that position could support the president’s authority to invoke Section 338 and the latest round of counter-tariffs.

To date, no legal challenges have been brought against the use of Section 338.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More