ARTICLE
7 October 2025

Texas Wants Another Chance To Convince 5th Circuit That The PWFA Was Enacted In A Way That Violates The Constitution

JL
Jackson Lewis P.C.

Contributor

Focused on employment and labor law since 1958, Jackson Lewis P.C.’s 1,000+ attorneys located in major cities nationwide consistently identify and respond to new ways workplace law intersects business. We help employers develop proactive strategies, strong policies and business-oriented solutions to cultivate high-functioning workforces that are engaged, stable and diverse, and share our clients’ goals to emphasize inclusivity and respect for the contribution of every employee.
The State of Texas asked the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals earlier this week to reconsider its case challenging the validity of the entire Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (PWFA).
United States Texas Employment and HR

The State of Texas asked the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals earlier this week to reconsider its case challenging the validity of the entire Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (PWFA). Texas filed suit against the federal government shortly after President Biden signed the Consolidated Appropriations Act in December 2022, claiming the PWFA could not be enforced against it because Congress violated the U.S. Constitution when it passed the bill relying on the COVID-19-pandemic-era rule permitting non-present members of Congress to be included in the quorum count and vote by proxy.

On Aug. 15, 2025, a divided panel of the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals held that the PWFA was constitutionally enacted because the Quorum Clause did not require members of Congress to be physically present when they enacted the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2023, which included the PWFA. The 5th Circuit's decision reversed the Northern District of Texas' Feb. 27, 2024 decision permanently enjoining the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and Department of Justice (DOJ) from enforcing the PWFA against the State of Texas and its agencies.

Today, the 5th Circuit stayed further proceedings in this case pending the restoration of appropriations to the Department of Justice.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More