ARTICLE
22 June 2026

AGs Urge FTC Action On Food Delivery Platforms

SH
Shook, Hardy & Bacon

Contributor

Shook, Hardy & Bacon has long been recognized as one of the premier litigation firms in the country. For more than a century, the firm has defended companies in their most substantial national and international products liability, mass tort and complex litigation matters.

The firm has leveraged its complex product liability litigation expertise to expand into several other practice areas and advance its mission of “being the best in the world at providing creative and practical solutions at unsurpassed value.” As a result, the firm has built nationally recognized practices in areas such as intellectual property, environmental and toxic tort, employment litigation, commercial litigation, government enforcement and compliance, and public policy.

State attorneys general from sixteen jurisdictions are pushing the Federal Trade Commission to extend its Rule on Unfair and Deceptive Fees to cover online food delivery platforms. The coalition raises concerns about drip pricing, dynamic pricing algorithms, and personalized pricing practices that may prevent consumers from making informed purchasing decisions in this rapidly growing industry.
United States Consumer Protection
Shook, Hardy & Bacon are most popular:
  • within Corporate/Commercial Law, Criminal Law and Privacy topic(s)
  • with readers working within the Basic Industries, Environment & Waste Management and Technology industries

Sixteen state attorneys general are urging the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to amend its Rule on Unfair and Deceptive Fees to apply to the online food delivery industry. AGs from New York, Tennessee, Arizona, Connecticut, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Illinois, Maryland, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oregon, Vermont, Virginia and Washington sent a letter providing comment on the agency’s Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Unfair or Deceptive Fees in Online Food Delivery Services.

In the letter, they point to explosive growth in the industry in recent years, noting that they have become an essential feature of many consumers’ lives. They expressed concern that the law is not keeping up with unique harms flowing from newer technologies. Specific issues they call out are drip pricing, markups and price differentials, the use of dynamic pricing and personalized pricing. They noted that consumers cannot meaningfully avoid personalized pricing they do not know about.

“Moreover, the data that companies use to offer personalized prices, from what source companies acquire that data, and how that data influences prices, are all material conditions that consumers must understand to make informed purchasing decisions,” they said.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More