ARTICLE
10 January 2008

A Sparkling Decision

WB
Wedlake Bell

Contributor

Wedlake Bell logo
We are a contemporary London law firm, rooted in tradition with a lasting legacy of client service. Founded in 1780, we recognise the long-standing relationships we have with our clients and how they have helped shape our past and provide a platform for our future. With 76 partners supported by over 300 lawyers and support staff, we operate on a four practice group model: private client, business services, real estate and dispute resolution. Our driving force is to empower our clients by providing quality legal advice, insight and intelligence that enables them to achieve their goals whether personal or business. We are large enough to advise on the most complex matters, but small enough to ensure that our people and our work remain exceptional and dynamic. Building relationships is at the heart of everything we do.
CIVC, the French champagne wine-growers trade association has won on appeal its complaint under Nominet’s Dispute Resolution Service Policy concerning the unauthorized registration of the domain name champagne.co.uk.
United Kingdom Media, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment

CIVC, the French champagne wine-growers trade association, has won on appeal its complaint under Nominet's Dispute Resolution Service Policy concerning the unauthorized registration of the domain name champagne.co.uk (the "Domain Name").

The respondent ("R"), a Mr. Jackson, registered the Domain Name without the knowledge or consent of CIVC, which filed a formal complaint with Nominet in February 2007. But the Nominet Independent Expert held that the Domain Name's registration was not abusive, and rejected the complaint. CIVC unsurprisingly appealed.

The Nominet Appeal Panel approached the appeal as a reconsideration of the merits. They considered: 1) Did CIVC have rights in the name "champagne"? and 2) Was R's registration of the Domain Name "abusive" within the meaning of the Nominet Dispute Resolution Service?

The Panel agreed with the Expert that CIVC did indeed have rights in the word "champagne". However, they did not agree with the Expert's finding that there had not been an abusive registration by R. They found no evidence of any use of the Domain Name by R in connection with a genuine offering of goods or services before the Complaint was sent to R; indeed, there was evidence that R had used the Domain Name to link to commercial websites, including ones relating to car number plates. Accordingly, the Panel allowed CIVC's appeal and directed that the Domain Name be transferred from R to CIVC. The decision represents another victory for champagne growers in their ongoing campaign to protect the intellectual property rights in the word "champagne".

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More