Climate finance took centre stage at COP29 in Baku, Azerbaijan, as participating nations worked toward the creation of a sustainable financial framework for combating climate change. The topics of discussions included addressing the needs for funding and new funding mechanisms, alongside establishing a more robust system for carbon markets and credits.
The New Collective Quantified Goal (NCQG) in Climate Finance
A critical focus at COP29 was the establishment of a new, ambitious climate finance target known as the New Collective Quantified Goal (NCQG). This goal, set to replace the $100 billion annual target created at COP15 in 2009, is expected to drive trillions of dollars toward climate action in developing nations. The aim of the NCQG is to provide a broader, more inclusive funding source, accommodating both public sector contributions from wealthier nations and private investments from around the globe.
The NCQG is structured to support both climate adaptation and mitigation efforts, with attention to high-priority goals like green infrastructure and resilience to climate impacts. Yet, debates continue over the balance of responsibilities. Developing nations advocate for a substantial increase in public finance from developed countries, given their historical contributions to greenhouse gas emissions. Wealthier countries, meanwhile, emphasize the need for private sector participation and contributions from emerging economies like China.
Funding for Loss and Damage
As climate-related disasters escalate, the topic of "loss and damage" funding has grown more urgent. COP28 saw the establishment of the Loss and Damage Fund, which allocated a modest $700 million, though estimates suggest that actual needs could exceed $580 billion by 2030. At COP29, nations pushed for more robust financial commitments, hoping to strengthen the Loss and Damage Fund to support nations experiencing catastrophic impacts, such as floods, storms, and rising sea levels.
The loss and damage discussions had a strong justice component, with developing countries pointing out that they contribute significantly less to global emissions but bear disproportionately high costs of climate change impacts. To address these concerns, COP29 aims to encourage high-income countries to deliver substantial financial support for immediate relief and long-term resilience-building in vulnerable regions like Bangladesh, Pakistan, and Pacific island nations.
Closing the Adaptation Finance Gap
The adaptation finance gap remains a significant challenge, as current funding levels fall far short of the estimated $194 - $366 billion needed annually to meet global adaptation requirements. The Global Goal on Adaptation (GGA), established in previous climate agreements, aims to build resilience against climate impacts and reduce vulnerability in affected countries. At COP29, nations were focused on enhancing the GGA's framework, ensuring that adaptation funding is accessible with flexible terms and low-interest rates to enable more equitable implementation.
Developing countries, particularly those most exposed to climate hazards, have advocated for a structure that allows easier tracking of adaptation progress. Many nations also proposed a dedicated funding stream specifically for adaptation within the NCQG, seeking to place adaptation on par with mitigation in terms of financial commitments and accountability.
Carbon Credits and the Role of Carbon Markets
Carbon credits and markets, governed under Article 6 of the Paris Agreement, are a crucial part of COP29's climate finance strategy. Carbon markets allow countries to offset emissions by purchasing carbon credits, typically from projects that remove carbon from the atmosphere or prevent emissions. This mechanism provides flexibility for nations aiming to meet their emissions targets by investing in reductions abroad, which can benefit both buyer and seller countries economically.
At COP29, nations worked to strengthen international carbon market rules, ensuring that credits are transparently verified and that emissions reductions are both real and additional. This includes developing stronger regulatory frameworks to prevent issues like "double-counting," where emissions reductions are claimed by more than one country. Additionally, COP29 sought to improve accessibility for smaller developing nations to participate in carbon markets, which could help them fund sustainable development and climate initiatives.
Critics argue that carbon markets and credits should not replace direct emissions reductions but should be seen as a complementary strategy, especially since carbon credit systems alone cannot fully offset the extensive emissions from industrialized nations. However, with careful regulation and accountability, carbon markets can play a supportive role in the global effort to curb emissions and finance climate action across borders.
Future Outlook on Climate Finance
COP29's focus on climate finance reflects a growing recognition that only with substantial investment can global climate goals, including the 1.5°C target of the Paris Agreement, be met. The summit's outcomes will likely shape future climate policies, especially in areas requiring coordinated financial support, such as loss and damage, adaptation, and carbon markets. Nations will continue to balance immediate climate needs with long-term financing strategies, emphasising both public contributions from developed countries and private sector engagement. The resolutions from COP29 will set a precedent for future climate negotiations, aiming to secure a sustainable and just financial framework for climate resilience worldwide.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
