ARTICLE
1 October 2025

The Hague District Court Grants Injunction Against Glenmark For G-Standaard Listing Of Eltrombopag 14 Days Prior To SPC Expiry Novartis

AO
A&O Shearman

Contributor

A&O Shearman was formed in 2024 via the merger of two historic firms, Allen & Overy and Shearman & Sterling. With nearly 4,000 lawyers globally, we are equally fluent in English law, U.S. law and the laws of the world’s most dynamic markets. This combination creates a new kind of law firm, one built to achieve unparalleled outcomes for our clients on their most complex, multijurisdictional matters – everywhere in the world. A firm that advises at the forefront of the forces changing the current of global business and that is unrivalled in its global strength. Our clients benefit from the collective experience of teams who work with many of the world’s most influential companies and institutions, and have a history of precedent-setting innovations. Together our lawyers advise more than a third of NYSE-listed businesses, a fifth of the NASDAQ and a notable proportion of the London Stock Exchange, the Euronext, Euronext Paris and the Tokyo and Hong Kong Stock Exchanges.
This case concerns infringement by Glenmark on Novartis' SPC 300451 for eltrombopag (marketed as Revolade®). Novartis sought urgent relief after Glenmark included its generic "Eltrombopag Glenmark"...
Switzerland Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences

This case concerns infringement by Glenmark on Novartis' SPC 300451 for eltrombopag (marketed as Revolade®). Novartis sought urgent relief after Glenmark included its generic "Eltrombopag Glenmark" product in the Dutch "G-Standaard" (the Dutch pharmaceutical database showing medicines (soon to be) available on the Dutch market), which was listed on 1 September 2025 while Novartis' SPC expired on 14 September 2025. Glenmark contended that such preparatory steps were necessary for Day one entry and should be permitted, referencing the balancing of interest made in the SPC Regulation, the EU SPC manufacturing waiver, and the proposed Bolar-exception expansions.

These arguments did not hold. The Court reaffirmed that G-Standaard listing qualifies as an "offering" and thus infringes the SPC if done before expiry. The judge rejected Glenmark's argument that preparatory acts for Day one entry justify early listing, noting that the SPC Regulation's waivers referred to by Glenmark in this respect do not extend to market offers or listings and that Glenmark had not even applied for such waivers. The Court, citing UPC Court of Appeal Boehringer v Zentiva, also dismissed reliance on the draft EU Pharma Package, emphasizing that legislative proposals do not alter current law, and that even under the draft, commercial offers would remain excluded from the exception. Lastly, the Court held that any administrative inflexibility in the G-Standaard system is not a justification for infringement.

The Court therefore concluded that early G-Standaard listing causes immediate commercial harm to the SPC holder, including price erosion and loss of exclusivity. The injunction was granted, including orders for removal and rectification, with significant penalties for non-compliance.

District Court of the Hague, 27 August 2025, C/09/690339, Novartis AG v Glenmark Arzneimittel GMBH

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More