The NIST Privacy Framework is a voluntary tool developed in collaboration with stakeholders to assist organizations in identifying and managing privacy risks while fostering innovation in products and services, all while safeguarding individuals' privacy. Initially released in January 2020, Privacy Framework 1.0 was designed to help organizations establish and maintain privacy protections across their operations, ensuring compliance with relevant privacy laws and regulations. On April 14, 2025, NIST published a draft version of Privacy Framework 1.1 (PFW), inviting stakeholder feedback until June 13, 2025, to refine and enhance the framework's guidance for evolving privacy challenges.
Why update the Privacy Framework 1.0?
In February 2024, four years after the release of PFW 1.0, NIST introduced the updated Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 (CSF 2.0) to assist organizations in navigating and managing cybersecurity risks. The distinction between PFW 1.0 and CSF 2.0, coupled with the inseparable relationship between data privacy and cybersecurity, presents challenges for organizations striving to implement both frameworks effectively.
Additionally, the emergence of new technologies, particularly Artificial Intelligence (AI), and their integration into business and consumer models have had a profound impact on the information technology landscape. The privacy risks associated with AI are as rapidly evolving and complex as the technology itself, necessitating continuous adaptation and proactive risk management. It is essential for stakeholders to address these dynamic privacy risks and as a result, a key focus of PFW 1.1 is to provide guidance on managing the privacy risks linked to the increasing use of AI technologies.
What has changed?
A key element shared by both the PFW and CSF 2.0 is the 'Core'; a set of activities and outcomes that facilitate organizational risk management discussions. The updates in PFW 1.1 align its Core structure with that of CSF 2.0, enabling more cohesive and integrated implementation. The revision primarily enhances the Govern and Protect functions by incorporating categories from CSF 2.0. Notably, the addition of the 'Oversight' category supports the evaluation of privacy risk management and informs strategic adjustments. Similarly, new categories such as Platform Security and Technology Infrastructure Resilience address cybersecurity aspects that intersect with data privacy.
The PFW 1.1 introduces a new section on 'AI and Privacy Risk Management,' outlining how organizations can apply the Core principles to manage the privacy risks associated with AI systems. For instance, the Roles, Responsibilities, and Authorities Category (GV.RR-P) helps define clear roles and responsibilities around AI and privacy, fostering accountability and continuous improvement. Furthermore, prioritizing outcomes in the Monitoring and Review Category (GV.MT-P) ensures that policies are regularly assessed and updated to address evolving AI privacy risks. The Control-P and Communicate-P Functions enable organizations to implement technical measures like de-identification and provide users with control over data processing, supporting key privacy objectives such as data minimization and user autonomy
Impact on Indian Companies
For Indian companies especially those handling global data or providing services within U.S., the updated PFW 1.1 framework provides a valuable, voluntary tool to strengthen privacy governance and align with international best practices. As India continues to emerge as a key Global Capability Centre (GCC) hub, Indian companies are increasingly responsible for processing sensitive U.S. data such as healthcare, financial records, employee and consumer information while also delivering AI-powered services, emerging technology solutions, and managing cross-border data flows. Though this data is processed offshore, it remains firmly within the scope of U.S. privacy expectations and regulatory oversight. U.S. stakeholders, bound by stringent laws like HIPAA and the CCPA, expect their Indian partners to uphold the same high standards of data protection and governance that apply within the United States.
The PFW 1.1, developed in the U.S., offers Indian companies a structured approach to align with global best practices. By adopting it, they mirror U.S. style risk management, strengthen trust, and position themselves as credible, privacy-conscious partners. While India's Digital Personal Data Protection Act (DPDPA) 2023 provides a solid legal base, integrating NIST enhances international interoperability and prepares Indian firms for future global compliance demands. For U.S. stakeholders, partnering with Indian firms aligned with NIST simplifies compliance, reduces risk, and ensures data is protected consistently regardless of location.
Conclusion
While data privacy focuses on protecting individuals' rights and personal information, cybersecurity safeguards against unauthorized access and breaches at the organizational level. These two pillars are inherently interconnected and together form the foundation for securing data and maintaining trust in digital ecosystems. The updates aim to enhance the compatibility of PFW 1.1 with CSF 2.0. Achieving alignment between the two is essential, as a balanced approach enables organizations to address privacy and cybersecurity holistically and effectively.
The updates in the PFW 1.1 reflect NIST's commitment to aligning privacy and cybersecurity risk management in response to technological advancements, particularly AI. By harmonizing with CSF 2.0 and addressing AI-specific privacy concerns, the framework enhances organizations' ability to manage risks more cohesively.
For Indian businesses, aligning with such frameworks not only streamlines compliance with global standards but also highlights a commitment to responsible data stewardship, boosting credibility with international stakeholders. In today's data-driven economy, these strengths offer Indian companies a competitive edge in attracting global business and position India's GCC ecosystem as a frontrunner in privacy-focused digital operations.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
