India: Arbitration & Dispute Resolution

Subscribe
Litigation law, mediation law, and arbitrage law thought leadership, articles, podcasts, videos and webinars from expert sources across the legal world. Explore insights covering civil law, class actions, dispute resolution, libel and defamation and more in relation to litigation, mediation and arbitration.
Article
When A Territorial Licence Crosses Borders: Product Dossiers, Copyright And Confidential Know-How In Jubilant Generics Ltd. v. Jamp India Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd.
In the pharmaceutical industry, a Product Dossier may be as commercially valuable as the product itself. A pharmaceutical Product Dossier comprises of technical, scientific and regulatory information used to develop, register and commercialise a medicinal product. It may include material on composition, manufacturing, quality, stability, safety, efficacy and regulatory approvals. Its commercial value lies not only in the information itself but also in the expertise, time and investment required to compile and develop it for regulatory and commercial use.
India IP
DD
Dhir & Dhir Associates
Article
Putting An End To The Hydra Head: Supreme Court Reaffirms The Clean Slate Doctrine In Tata Steel v. Varsha
The Supreme Court, in the case of Tata Steel Ltd. v. Varsha & Anr. (2026 INSC 717) (‘Tata Steel v. Varsha’), has held that an Operational Creditor cannot revive its full, uncrystallized sub-judice claim through a pending court or arbitration proceeding, once that claim has been admitted at a quantified value of Re. 1 in an approved Resolution Plan. Participating in the insolvency process by lodging a claim before the Resolution Professional does not preserve the creditor's right to separately pursue the full claim through the pending suit or arbitration after the Plan is approved.
India Litigation
KS
King, Stubb & Kasiva
Article
Proof Over Presumption: Supreme Court Reaffirms Principles Of Title Disputes
The dispute arose from competing claims to agricultural land in Karnataka, but the principles reaffirmed by the Court extend well beyond the facts of the case. The judgment clarifies the limited operation of Section 43 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, outlines the permissible scope of rectification deeds, and reaffirms the limits of the High Court's jurisdiction under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
India Litigation
SA
Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co
Article
SC Recognises And Applies Principle Of Transnational Issue Estoppel In Foreign-Award Enforcement Proceedings
The Supreme Court of India has applied the doctrine of 'transnational issue estoppel' in a landmark ruling, establishing that parties cannot re-litigate issues already decided by foreign courts when challenging foreign award enforcement in India. This decision addresses the critical intersection of international arbitration, foreign judgments, and domestic enforcement proceedings.
India Litigation
AP
AZB & Partners
Article
SC Holds That Granting Interim Reliefs To Unsuccessful Party In Arbitration Should Be Done Only In Rare And Compelling Cases
The Supreme Court has clarified the scope of interim relief available under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, addressing whether unsuccessful parties in arbitration proceedings retain the right to seek protective measures post-award. This landmark ruling examines the interpretation of 'a party' under the statutory framework and establishes the stringent standards courts must apply when evaluating such applications from parties who did not prevail in arbitration.
India Litigation
AP
AZB & Partners
Article
Foreign Award Enforcement: Section 48 Of The Arbitration Act Cannot Be Used To Re-Litigate Issues Decided At The Seat; Supreme Court Invokes Transnational Issue Estoppel
In Nagaraj V. Mylandla vs. PI Opportunities Fund-I [2026 INSC 298], the Supreme Court considered a recurring problem in foreign award enforcement: whether an award debtor, after unsuccessfully challenging an award before the court at the seat, can resist enforcement in India by re-framing the same objections as questions of Indian public policy.
India Litigation
Trinity Chambers
Article
Contractual Bars On Interest In Infrastructure Contracts: Scope And Equitable Limits
Delayed projects are a commercial reality in infrastructure contracts, often caused by factors solely attributable to the employer, such as late site handover, delayed approvals, and design changes. These delays increase the contractor's costs and frequently postpone payments due under Running Account (RA) bills, which themselves depend on certifications and approvals controlled by the employer.
India Commercial
Fox & Mandal
Article
When A Filing Is No Filing: The Doctrine Of Non-Est Filings Under Section 34
When a challenge to an arbitral award is filed within limitation but suffers from fundamental defects, can such defects be cured through re-filing after the limitation period expires? This analysis examines the judicial evolution of the non-est filing doctrine under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, exploring how courts distinguish between curable procedural irregularities and fatal substantive defects that render a filing legally non-existent.
India Litigation
HS
Hammurabi & Solomon
Article
The End Of Piecemeal Challenges? Supreme Court Strengthens India’s Single-Challenge Approach To Arbitration
One of the principal advantages of arbitration is its ability to deliver a final and binding resolution without becoming entangled in the multiple layers of procedural litigation that often characterize traditional court proceedings. However, that objective can be undermined when parties repeatedly approach courts at various stages of the arbitral process, challenging interim decisions before a final award is rendered.
India Litigation
KS
King, Stubb & Kasiva
See more