Germany introduces a statutory minimum quota for female
representatives on supervisory boards of co-determined (50/50),
listed companies. In addition, the new law obligates numerous
companies to observe rules regarding the composition of their
supervisory boards and leadership positions. On 6 March 2015
the German parliament (Bundestag) passed the "Act on Equal
Participation of Women and Men regarding Leadership Positions
within the Sectors of Private Economy and Public Service"
("Gesetz für die gleichberechtigte Teilhabe von Frauen
und Männern an Führungspositionen in der Privatwirtschaft
und im öffentlichen Dienst").
The Act introduces a legally binding quota in Germany for the first time. At least 30% of the members of supervisory boards of publicly listed companies with 50/50 co-determined supervisory boards, i.e. supervisory boards in which half of the members are employee representatives, will need to be female.
Additionally, both, publicly listed companies and companies that have co-determined supervisory boards — either as 50/50 co-determined boards or as third-participation boards — will have to set their own targets for the composition of the managing board, the supervisory board and leadership positions. These targets, deadlines and information on target achievement, plus the reasons for any failure, have to be publicly disclosed.
These rules also apply to European Stock Corporations (Societas Europaea - SE) whose supervisory or administrative board has equal representation of shareholder and employee representatives due to the applicable co-determination agreement or applicable laws.
Fixed Quota Requirement
The fixed 30% quota for supervisory boards of publicly listed
companies that have a 50/50 co-determined supervisory board
generally must be met by the supervisory board as a body (Joint
Fulfillment). It therefore does not matter whether the shareholder
and employee representatives reach the quota individually as long
as the overall proportion of women reaches 30% or more. However,
both sides can object against the system of Joint Fulfillment prior
to every election of the supervisory board. If one side exercises
this right, both sides, the shareholder and the employee
representatives, need to achieve the 30% quota separately (Separate
The quota comes into force and must be observed for new supervisory board positions from 1 January 2016. In order to enforce the obligation to comply with the quota, the Act contains a so-called "empty chair" doctrine. Under this doctrine, an election that violates the quota will be deemed null and void and the relevant seats will remain vacant. In case of an election of individual supervisory board members in a shareholders' meeting, the chronological order of the elections shall decide for which elected member the election is null and void. If the supervisory board is elected as a whole, the entire election will be deemed void with respect to the gender which is overrepresented; the election of candidates of the underrepresented gender, however, is valid. The chairman of the general meeting will not have the right to put a nomination to vote which, if successful, would not be in line with the quota.
As regards the employee representatives, new provisions will be introduced to the German Co-Determination Act concerning a special quota requirement of employee and trade union representatives in case of Separate Fulfillment. In this regard, an "empty chair" doctrine will also apply. This "empty chair" can then be filled by judicial appointment.
Equality Concept for Managers and Managerial Staff
Publicly listed companies and companies that are subject to (parity and one-third) co-determination must give themselves rules for a concept of equal participation within leading positions. According to estimates of the Federal Ministries involved, about 3,500 large and medium sized companies are affected.
Scope of Application and Responsibility
Targets for quotas have to be determined for legal representative bodies, supervisory boards and the two top management levels below executive management. The management board, respectively the managing directors, have to set quota targets for the upper management. The supervisory board or, in one-third co-determined companies the shareholders' meeting is responsible for the determination of quota targets for the supervisory board (unless the fixed quota applies) and for the management board, respectively for the managing directors.
Targets and Deadlines
A minimum quota regarding the proportion of women has not been
defined by the Act. However, the Act aims for equal representation
and intends to avoid a decline in the status quo. Therefore, if, by
the time the targets are set, the actual proportion of women on the
relevant hierarchy levels is less than 30%, the targets set must
not fall below the current proportion. If the proportion of women
on the relevant hierarchy levels is more than 30% by the time the
targets are determined, the set targets may also be lower than the
quota that has already been reached.
The obligation to set targets will be triggered on the day the Act comes into force. First targets must be set by 30 September 2015, with a deadline to reach these targets no later than 30 June 2017. Subsequent deadlines must not exceed a period of five years.
Targets and deadlines must be published in the management report (Lagebericht). This also applies to information as to whether targets have been met and, in case of failure, reasons for failure. Companies that are not under a statutory obligation to publish a management report must publish this information on their websites. Information on target achievement must be published after the relevant deadline has expired.
Consequences of Missed Targets or Breach of Publication Requirements
The Act does not stipulate any sanctions where targets are not
reached. However, if targets are not met, the company must publish
clear information about its efforts to reach the targets and the
reasons why the targets have been failed. This approach shall
incentivize companies to set high targets under public awareness
and avoid that companies set low targets in view of severe
Inaccurate or incomplete information in status reports may qualify as a misdemeanor for which a fine of up to EUR 50,000.00 may be imposed.
The current composition of supervisory boards is not affected by
the new quota requirements. In relation to future elections,
companies must ensure that the fixed quota will be gradually
achieved from 1 January 2016. Replacements must be made with
representatives of the underrepresented gender until the fixed
quota is met.
With regard to the provisions on the concept of equal participation, affected companies, in a first step, need to analyze the status quo on their boards and management. Thereafter, management and supervisory board (or shareholders' meeting) need to agree on and set quota targets. These targets will obviously be different in different industries.
For companies that do not reach the 30% quota on a relevant hierarchy level, the status quo sets the minimum threshold. We recommend that affected companies start looking into these issues as soon as possible. The self-imposed targets should be realistic in order for companies to be able to achieve them within the first two years.
>em>Mayer Brown is a global legal services provider comprising legal practices that are separate entities (the "Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP and Mayer Brown Europe – Brussels LLP, both limited liability partnerships established in Illinois USA; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales (authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and registered in England and Wales number OC 303359); Mayer Brown, a SELAS established in France; Mayer Brown JSM, a Hong Kong partnership and its associated entities in Asia; and Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of the Mayer Brown Practices in their respective jurisdictions. The "Solicitors' Code of Conduct" published by the Solicitors Regulation Authority sets out the rules and principles of professional conduct for practising solicitors and can be accessed by the following link: http://www.sra.org.uk/solicitors/handbook/code/content.page.This publication provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest to our clients and friends. The material is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed in this publication.
© 2015 The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.