ARTICLE
18 October 2022

Supply Chain Due Diligence - Questionnaire For Reporting Published By German Authority

MB
Mayer Brown

Contributor

Mayer Brown is a distinctively global law firm, uniquely positioned to advise the world’s leading companies and financial institutions on their most complex deals and disputes. We have deep experience in high-stakes litigation and complex transactions across industry sectors, including our signature strength, the global financial services industry.
Companies have long been awaiting some more clarity on their reporting obligations vis à vis the German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (SCDDA). The BAFA has now shed some...
Germany International Law
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Companies have long been awaiting some more clarity on their reporting obligations vis à vis the German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (SCDDA). The BAFA has now shed some light on what is expected of the reporting entities by publishing 38 detailed questions (in addition to some general information on the reporting entity) covering the whole spectrum of due diligence obligations under the SCDDA.

The first reports will be due no later than four months after the end of the financial year of the reporting entity that ends during the calendar year 2023 (for enterprises with 3,000 or more employees) or 2024 (for enterprises with 1,000 or more employees). The questionnaire will be made available in spring 2023 as an online tool, where companies must submit their responses in German.

The questions include mandatory as well as voluntary questions. BAFA assures the reporting entities that not answering the voluntary questions will not result in disadvantages for the reporting company. However, responding to the voluntary questions may lead to a shorter audit within the scope of a possible risk-based control without any further requests for evidence.

Overall, the questions include a mix of multiple-choice questions as well as free text fields to provide more detailed information. The complete questionnaire is structured in different sections:

  1. Strategy and anchoring (A): The first section requires a description of responsibilities overseeing risk management, information on the reporting entities' policy statements on human rights strategy, and information on how the human rights strategy is anchored within the organization.
  2. Risk analysis and preventive measures (B): Section B requests detailed information on risk analysis (implementation, procedure and results), and description of prevention measures implemented in (i) the company's own business area, (ii) at direct suppliers, as well as (iii) at indirect suppliers. This section of the questionnaire also requires information on how the results of the risk analysis are communicated internally to key decision makers, and information on any amendments or review of the risks analysis effectiveness.
  3. Findings of injury and remedial action (C): This section requires information on findings of violations and corrective actions taken on the reporting entities' (i) own business area, (ii) at its direct suppliers, and (iii) at its indirect suppliers.
  4. Complaints procedure (D): Further, the reporting entities must provide a detailed description of the complaints procedure that is mandatory under the SCDDA.
  5. Risk management assessment and conclusions (E): In the questionnaire's final section, the reporting entities must elaborate on their process to review risk management across the board for its appropriateness, effectiveness and adequate consideration of the interests of (potentially) affected parties.

As the questionnaire comprehensively covers the SCDDA's obligations, it requires quite detailed information from the reporting entities. However, as the questions are quite clear and structured according to law, the questionnaire does support the reporting entities in complying with their reporting obligations, making the process quite streamlined and manageable.

Mayer Brown is a global legal services provider comprising legal practices that are separate entities (the "Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP and Mayer Brown Europe - Brussels LLP, both limited liability partnerships established in Illinois USA; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales (authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and registered in England and Wales number OC 303359); Mayer Brown, a SELAS established in France; Mayer Brown JSM, a Hong Kong partnership and its associated entities in Asia; and Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of the Mayer Brown Practices in their respective jurisdictions.

© Copyright 2020. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.

This Mayer Brown article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More