China: Trademark

商标作为企业的重要无形资产，其信息的及时变更对维护商标权益至关重要。企业在发展过程中常因更名或搬迁而需要变更商标信息，若未及时办

2026年中国国際サービス貿易交易会の一環として開催された知財サービス業発展国際大会では、改正商標法の解説、北京市の知財金融支援システ

최근 중국 지식재산 전문지 중국 지식산권보는 <<지식재산권 보호 및 활용 ‘15·5’ 규획 (2026-2030)>>의 주요 목표지표를 설명하고, 2030년까지 고가치 발명특허, 지식재산 집약형 산업, 저작권 산업, 지리적표시 및 지식재산 보호수준을 높이는 방향을 제시하였다.

広東省高級人民法院はこのほど、「百度」の商標を電子機器メーカーが工場や製品、オンライン店舗などで使用した事件の二審判決を下し、侵害行為の停止、企業名称の変更、経済損失500万元と権利行使費用5万4457.38元の賠償を命じた。（1元は約23.7円）

The Guangzhou Intellectual Property Court held a symposium on August 20 to review its mediation achievements over the past year, analyzing challenges in IP dispute resolution and exploring future priorities. The court successfully mediated over 3,000 cases through pre-litigation processes and effectively managed mass litigation involving thousands of related cases...

A Chinese court ruled that Molly Tea's floral logo infringed Louis Vuitton's registered trade marks, awarding $1.5 million in damages despite public backlash. The case sparked debate about Western luxury brands claiming exclusive rights over geometric floral motifs that resemble traditional Chinese decorative patterns. This landmark decision offers critical insights into how Chinese courts assess trade mark similarity, consumer perception, and cross-industry brand protection.

最高检发布知识产权恶意诉讼惩治典型案例，详细剖析一起商标恶意抢注及恶意诉讼案件。案件涉及企业恶意抢注"长高电新"商标后提起侵权诉讼ಃ

China's Supreme People's Procuratorate has released five landmark cases addressing malicious intellectual property litigation, including a notable trademark infringement case where a Shenzhen company was found to have registered over 600 trademarks without genuine business operations, filing bulk lawsuits to extract undue benefits. The case demonstrates how procuratorial authorities use big data screening and comprehensive investigation to identify and combat trademark hoarding schemes that abuse the judici

China's Supreme People's Procuratorate has released a landmark case involving malicious intellectual property litigation, where two companies preemptively registered a trademark in bad faith and then sued the legitimate business owner for infringement, seeking CNY 10 million in damages. The case demonstrates how procuratorial authorities can intervene to identify and sanction parties who abuse the judicial system through defective trademark rights and improper litigation motives.